kalibane wrote:Oh one other thing that I forgot to mention that makes me wonder about how well GB is going to handle this in the long run. When asked about the onside kick all the coaches including McCarthy and pretty much all the players didn't hesitate to point out that the Bostick kid was supposed to block for Jordy Nelson behind him and basically blew his assignment.
Do you think you would ever hear that come out of the Seattle, New England, Denver or even the San Fran locker room? Because I don't. Maybe he catches crap behind the scenes but I'm willing to bet that our coach and players would deflect that question rather than throw one of their teammates under the bus to the press. Didn't sit well with me.
burrrton wrote:Oh, and another thing- Matthews' hit on Wilson was bush-league, cheap-ass bullsht.
I hope your fine doesn't cut into your Super Bowl party dip funds too deeply, Matthews, you sht.
kalibane wrote:There isn't a great team that ever existed in sports that didn't have some "luck" factor in their greatness. What makes them great is they put themselves in position to take advantage of when luck bounces their way.
Hawktawk wrote:Rodgers has been around for 11 years now, 8 as a starter. He just spent about 45 minutes on Seattle's side of the 50 with excellent protection from his line and one of the best receiving corps in the league. He went 19 for 33 for 174 yards, 1 TD, 2 picks and a rating of 54.Hes 0-3 vs. Wilson. And yet he's the Teflon man, much like Manning. Its never his fault even though he Is a bad throw by Michel Vick from never even getting to the big game. And over in the AFC Luck went 12 for 33 for 121 yards, 2 picks and no TDs. And yet I heard him described this morning as the best young QB in the league. You cant make this stuff up folks.
burrrton wrote:The more I'm reading the more aggravated I'm getting about this narrative.
Rodgers was shut the h3ll down, Lacy was shut the h3ll down, but RW stunk for 3 quarters so that means GB was clearly the better team?
I'm not sure I'm as ready to cede that as some.
RW had a slightly smaller rating for the day, but outside of that, GB was statistically outplayed in virtually every phase, weren't they?
HumanCockroach wrote:
Yes. Yes he is. Lost a lot of respect for Mathews yesterday.
Hawktown wrote:https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/A81DA9B6081168719551370842112_247ba8ec1b6.5.1.8590782140062285963.mp4?versionId=edYOekNPzauj.OT.t7QRFr45wnfXeEcr
Is this the sack your talking about. I'm not sure i see much of a problem here??? maybe a different angle or a close up would explain better???
looks like matthwes had to put a bit on russell to get him down though ,lol.
Hawktown wrote:https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/A81DA9B6081168719551370842112_247ba8ec1b6.5.1.8590782140062285963.mp4?versionId=edYOekNPzauj.OT.t7QRFr45wnfXeEcr
Is this the sack your talking about. I'm not sure i see much of a problem here??? maybe a different angle or a close up would explain better???
looks like matthwes had to put a bit on russell to get him down though ,lol.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests