c_hawkbob wrote:Just tell 'em "you're welcome", and "hope you can make it back for the rematch next year".
LOL classic. Brady agrees too.....
c_hawkbob wrote:Just tell 'em "you're welcome", and "hope you can make it back for the rematch next year".
c_hawkbob wrote:Just tell 'em "you're welcome", and "hope you can make it back for the rematch next year".
Old but Slow wrote:One issue that I have not heard brought up yet, is the team physicals that are coming up on both players. What if Unger fails his?
Old but Slow wrote:One issue that I have not heard brought up yet, is the team physicals that are coming up on both players. What if Unger fails his?
NorthHawk wrote:Max was out for 10 games last year and we almost won it all.
He might be easier to replace than Okung would.
Old but Slow wrote:One issue that I have not heard brought up yet, is the team physicals that are coming up on both players. What if Unger fails his?
savvyman wrote:LOL - Classic Readers Comment on the trade from one of the New Orleans Newspapers:
>>>>>>worriedincal 1 day ago
Look you do not give up a star te for no name unhealthy player. No disrespect to unger but he is no differences kee like a kam chancellor or earl Thomas or Sherman. If we would have swapped for one of those guys it would have made sense. Man you can't even do this trade on madden 14. Even a video game knows this trade is dumb<<<<<<<<
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the info on Graham's background, savvy. I've never heard anything one way or another.
I read where the Hawks felt that there was only 13 players they felt were worthy of a #1 pick. The possibility of one of them falling to #31 and having it be a player that fills a specific need is pretty long, which explains why we were so willing to part with a first rounder for a developed player that's definitely worth a first round pick. It's the same philosophy they used when they traded for Harvin a few years back, although that one included multiple picks.
Given this information, I'm not at all displeased with trading a #1. You're probably not going to get an impact player sitting at #31 even in years when the draft is really deep. My concern is replacing Unger. JS has said that they are not planning any specific moves to replace Unger, says they'll be waiting for other teams to cut players and pick through the rejects, which doesn't make me feel very warm and fuzzy.
Here's an interview done yesterday with John Schneider about the Unger/Graham trade that you might find interesting. There's also a poll in there about un-retiring Largent's #80 for Graham. I hope like hell they aren't considering that. We don't need anymore controversies.
http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seah ... -your-job/
Hawk Sista wrote:6. You cannot acquire a top 2 - 3 talent at a position (like Jimmy Graham IS) for nothing. It's how trades work. Anyone want to give me a Porsche Carrera for a Toyota? NO........... so Jimmy and a 4 + aging and oft injured Max for the second to the last spot in the first round (where experts only grade about 14 - 16 as having first round talent) is a trade more reflective of a Porsche for a Porsche. Depending on your viewpoint, you can decide who got the Boxter and who got the Carrera....but nobody got the Toyota.
NorthHawk wrote:The concern I have with Graham is his relative disappearance when playing us in important games.
Didn't one game we put KJ Wright on him and kept him in check? The other game it was someone else but he was largely ineffective.
NorthHawk wrote:The concern I have with Graham is his relative disappearance when playing us in important games.
Didn't one game we put KJ Wright on him and kept him in check? The other game it was someone else but he was largely ineffective.
Bob Condotta @bcondotta 2m2 minutes ago
Carroll says Graham told him his off-season plans were that "wherever Russell (Wilson) is going, I'm going'' for workouts.
savvyman wrote:I think the Standard Seahawk offensive set next year will be a two tight end offense.
I would imagine that at times we will bring in another offensive lineman as the second tight-end in the base set.
So two tight-end offense - Single back and two receivers (Richardson when Healthy and Baldwin). This is the offense with lots of smash mouth running, Play action and read option that that Pete is drooling to run.
Commit to much to stopping the run and teams will have to deal with Graham and Richardson, Baldwin one on one.
So unlike last year when teams stacked the box to stop our running game - this year they will pay dearly when they attempt to stack the box to stop Marshawn.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oDhyd-U8E
Bob Condotta @bcondotta
Follow
Graham says after shock wore off he got "a big grin on my face'' realizing "I was going to the best team in football.''
4:08 PM - 12 Mar 2015
kalibane wrote:I don't like this trade at all personally. Graham is a prima donna and doesn't block worth a damn. Plus the Saints have a dearth of weapons in the passing game so why would they be willing to dump their only established playmaker?
I know the Saints have major cap issues but this doesn't smell right.
Old but Slow wrote:We have been saying we need a big, tall receiver with skills for some time now. Now we have one. Perhaps he will be used more as a WR than as a TE, anyway. It seems to me that he and his agent tried to argue that he was a WR for salary reasons a year or so ago.
Unger played 6 games in the regular season last year, and while our numbers suffered some, we still won.
Old but Slow wrote:The Tacoma News Tribune's Seahawk Insider posted the transcript of a phone interview with Graham that allayed most of my concerns about him and his attitude:
http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks ... motivated/
It makes me think that what we have seen about his attitude has been from an opponent's viewpoint, much like what others might see from Richard Sherman. In his own locker room, he is loved and valued. Says he doesn't care about the numbers, only wants to win, and will go where Russell wants in order to build chemistry. I am jacked.
Hawk Sista wrote: That piece about his parents dropping him off at social services was heart-breaking. That he overcame what no child should have to endure, went to college, became a super-star and got his pilot's lic. in his spare time is impressive.
So far, so good.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:The BEST thing about having a T.E./Receiver the caliber of Jimmy Graham is that he will be the big reliable target that Russell Wilson has NEVER had before. I am sorry we had to give up Max Unger AND our #1 pick (though our #1 was more like a high #2) but a player the caliber of Graham will help the entire offense.
Now, however, John and Pete have got to rebuild our O-Line and make it a priority.
Two trips to the Super Bowl with a barely adequate O-Line is almost unheard of and we can't believe we can keep the same level of success w/o seriously upgrading our line.
RiverDog wrote:I wouldn't say that Russell has never had a 'big reliable target.' Sidney Rice was a big, reliable target in 2012, and Zach Miller wasn't bad, either, but neither could stay healthy.
But I get your point. Graham is just the type of player we've been asking for.
c_hawkbob wrote:Zach and Sidney were about a 3 and a 4 on the Graham (10) scale. Russ has truly never had this.
RiverDog wrote:
I wouldn't say that Russell has never had a 'big reliable target.' Sidney Rice was a big, reliable target in 2012, and Zach Miller wasn't bad, either, but neither could stay healthy.
But I get your point. Graham is just the type of player we've been asking for.
RiverDog wrote:A 3 or a 4? IMO that's a bit of an exaggeration. If we were to apply that scale to number of receptions, Graham would have to have about 150 receptions.
But I do agree with the premise that Graham has the potential to be the biggest receiving weapon that Russell has had since he's been here.
c_hawkbob wrote:No it's not an exaggeration, and of course it's not in number of catches, it's comparative talent level.
"Complaining about Jimmy Graham's blocking is like complaining that Kate Upton doesn't cook like Mario Batali"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests