Page 1 of 1

Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:33 pm
by jshawaii22
So here it is. I'm sure someone will wade through this, but what I gather, As long as it doesn't end in a 'coin flip' I'm good with it. We have the better conference record and better 'common opponent' records in any 3-way with Dallas, Detroit/GB.


PLAYOFF SEEDING CRITERIA

The six postseason participants from each conference will now be seeded as follows:

1. The division champion with the best record.
2. The division champion with the second-best record.
3. The division champion with the third-best record.
4. The division champion with the fourth-best record.
5. The wild-card team with the best record.
6. The wild-card team with the second-best record.

The following procedures will be used to break standings ties for postseason playoffs and to determine regular-season schedules.
NOTE: Tie games count as one-half win and one-half loss for both teams.

TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more teams in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.

Two teams
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the teams).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in common games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.

Three or more teams
(Note: If two teams remain tied after the third step or other teams are eliminated during any step, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the two-team format.)
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the teams).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in common games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.

TO BREAK A TIE FOR THE WILD-CARD TEAM
If it is necessary to break ties to determine the two wild-card teams from each conference, the following steps will be taken.
1. If the tied teams are from the same division, apply division tiebreaker.
2. If the tied teams are from different divisions, apply the following steps.

Two teams
1. Head-to-head, if applicable.
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
4. Strength of victory.
5. Strength of schedule.
6. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
7. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best net points in conference games.
9. Best net points in all games.
10. Best net touchdowns in all games.
11. Coin toss.

Three or more teams
(Note: If two teams remain tied after the third step or other teams are eliminated, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-team format.)
1. Apply division tiebreaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked team in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tiebreaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two wild-card participants.
2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one team has defeated each of the others or if one team has lost to each of the others.)
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in conference games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
12. Coin toss.

When the first wild-card team has been identified, the procedure is repeated to name the second wild card, i.e., eliminate all but the highest-ranked team in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. In situations where three or more teams from the same division are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams remains the same for subsequent applications of the tiebreaker if the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a wild-card berth.

OTHER TIEBREAKING PROCEDURES
1. Only one team advances to the playoffs in any tiebreaking step. Remaining tied teams revert to the first step of the applicable division or wild-card tiebreakers. As an example, if two teams remain tied in any tiebreaker step after all other teams have been eliminated, the procedure reverts to step one of the two-team format to determine the winner. When one team wins the tiebreaker, all other teams revert to step 1 of the applicable two-team or three-team format.
2. In comparing division and conference records or records against common opponents among tied teams, the best won-lost-tied percentage is the deciding factor since teams may have played an unequal number of games.
3. To determine home-field priority among division titlists, apply wild-card tiebreakers.
4. To determine home-field priority for wild-card qualifiers, apply division tiebreakers (if teams are from the same division) or wild-card tiebreakers (if teams are from different divisions).
5. To determine the best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed, add a team's position in the two categories, and the lowest score wins. For example, if Team A is first in points scored and second in points allowed, its combined ranking is 3. If Team B is third in points scored and first in points allowed, its combined ranking is 4. Team A then wins the tiebreaker. If two teams are tied for a position, both teams are awarded the ranking as if they held it solely. For example, if Team A and Team B are tied for first in points scored, each team is assigned a ranking of 1 in that category, and if Team C is third, its ranking will still be 3.

TIEBREAKING PROCEDURE FOR DRAFT ORDER
If two or more teams are tied in the selection order, the strength-of-schedule tiebreaker is applied, subject to the following exceptions for playoff teams:

1. Teams not participating in the playoffs shall select in the first through 20th positions in reverse standings order.
2. The Super Bowl winner is last and Super Bowl loser is next-to-last.
3. The losers of the conference championship games shall select 29th and 30th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
4. The losers of the divisional playoff games shall select 25th through 28th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
5. The losers of the wild-card games shall select 21st through 24th based on won-lost-tied percentage.

If ties exist in any grouping except (2) above, such ties shall be broken by strength of schedule. If any ties cannot be broken by strength of schedule, the divisional or conference tiebreakers, if applicable, shall be applied. Any ties that still exist shall be broken by a coin flip.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:00 pm
by burrrton
TL;DR

All it boils down to is we have to win out and either have Dallas lose a game, or (failing that) have another division champ also be 12-4 to bring the three-way tie break into play (which would give us the 1-seed).

Shorter: we keep winning and either have Dallas lose or everyone else keep winning, too.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:30 am
by RiverDog
burrrton wrote:TL;DR

All it boils down to is we have to win out and either have Dallas lose a game, or (failing that) have another division champ also be 12-4 to bring the three-way tie break into play (which would give us the 1-seed).

Shorter: we keep winning and either have Dallas lose or everyone else keep winning, too.


That's basically it. We have a better conference record than Dallas, Green Bay, and Detroit, so if we're in a three way tie with any of those 3 teams, we'll get HFA. If we are in a two way tie with either Green Bay or Detroit, we get HFA. Assuming that we win out, the only situation we do not get HFA is if we are in a two way tie with Dallas as they own the first tiebreaker over us by virtue of their win over us back in October.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:11 am
by Hawktawk
Dallas has lots to prove still. They don't defend their home stadium very well. If Seattle went in as the#2 I wouldn't be shocked to see them host the NFC championship anyway.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:45 am
by RiverDog
Hawktawk wrote:Dallas has lots to prove still. They don't defend their home stadium very well. If Seattle went in as the#2 I wouldn't be shocked to see them host the NFC championship anyway.


Same goes with the Packers. Going into Lambeau isn't all that intimidating to me, at least not with the way our defense is playing. Rodgers looked horrible against the Bills.

But I can guarantee you that a team like the Lions, of whom most have never set foot in our stadium, are scared to death of coming up here and will be rooting madly for us to lose one of our last two.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:44 am
by Long Time Fan
The simplest formula to understand is that if we win out and Dallas loses a game or both GB and Detroit win next week then we are assured of #1 seed. The fact that Gb and Detroit play each other the final week insure that one of the two finish 12-4 if they both win next week. We win tiebreaker head to head with either GB or Detroit and we will a three way tie with Dallas and either of the other two.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:46 am
by burrrton
The fact that Gb and Detroit play each other the final week insure that one of the two finish 12-4 if they both win next week.


Good point.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:05 am
by HumanCockroach
Win em' all, let God sort out the rest... GO HAWKS! ;)

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:20 am
by c_hawkbob
God's busy, we'll let the league do their own job.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:33 am
by NorthHawk
jshawaii22 wrote:So here it is. I'm sure someone will wade through this, but what I gather, As long as it doesn't end in a 'coin flip' I'm good with it. We have the better conference record and better 'common opponent' records in any 3-way with Dallas, Detroit/GB.


PLAYOFF SEEDING CRITERIA

The six postseason participants from each conference will now be seeded as follows:

1. The division champion with the best record.
2. The division champion with the second-best record.
3. The division champion with the third-best record.
4. The division champion with the fourth-best record.
5. The wild-card team with the best record.
6. The wild-card team with the second-best record.

The following procedures will be used to break standings ties for postseason playoffs and to determine regular-season schedules.
NOTE: Tie games count as one-half win and one-half loss for both teams.

TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more teams in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.

Two teams
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the teams).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in common games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.

Three or more teams
(Note: If two teams remain tied after the third step or other teams are eliminated during any step, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the two-team format.)
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the teams).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in common games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.

TO BREAK A TIE FOR THE WILD-CARD TEAM
If it is necessary to break ties to determine the two wild-card teams from each conference, the following steps will be taken.
1. If the tied teams are from the same division, apply division tiebreaker.
2. If the tied teams are from different divisions, apply the following steps.

Two teams
1. Head-to-head, if applicable.
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
4. Strength of victory.
5. Strength of schedule.
6. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
7. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best net points in conference games.
9. Best net points in all games.
10. Best net touchdowns in all games.
11. Coin toss.

Three or more teams
(Note: If two teams remain tied after the third step or other teams are eliminated, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-team format.)
1. Apply division tiebreaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked team in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tiebreaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two wild-card participants.
2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one team has defeated each of the others or if one team has lost to each of the others.)
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in conference games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
12. Coin toss.

When the first wild-card team has been identified, the procedure is repeated to name the second wild card, i.e., eliminate all but the highest-ranked team in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. In situations where three or more teams from the same division are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams remains the same for subsequent applications of the tiebreaker if the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a wild-card berth.

OTHER TIEBREAKING PROCEDURES
1. Only one team advances to the playoffs in any tiebreaking step. Remaining tied teams revert to the first step of the applicable division or wild-card tiebreakers. As an example, if two teams remain tied in any tiebreaker step after all other teams have been eliminated, the procedure reverts to step one of the two-team format to determine the winner. When one team wins the tiebreaker, all other teams revert to step 1 of the applicable two-team or three-team format.
2. In comparing division and conference records or records against common opponents among tied teams, the best won-lost-tied percentage is the deciding factor since teams may have played an unequal number of games.
3. To determine home-field priority among division titlists, apply wild-card tiebreakers.
4. To determine home-field priority for wild-card qualifiers, apply division tiebreakers (if teams are from the same division) or wild-card tiebreakers (if teams are from different divisions).
5. To determine the best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed, add a team's position in the two categories, and the lowest score wins. For example, if Team A is first in points scored and second in points allowed, its combined ranking is 3. If Team B is third in points scored and first in points allowed, its combined ranking is 4. Team A then wins the tiebreaker. If two teams are tied for a position, both teams are awarded the ranking as if they held it solely. For example, if Team A and Team B are tied for first in points scored, each team is assigned a ranking of 1 in that category, and if Team C is third, its ranking will still be 3.

TIEBREAKING PROCEDURE FOR DRAFT ORDER
If two or more teams are tied in the selection order, the strength-of-schedule tiebreaker is applied, subject to the following exceptions for playoff teams:

1. Teams not participating in the playoffs shall select in the first through 20th positions in reverse standings order.
2. The Super Bowl winner is last and Super Bowl loser is next-to-last.
3. The losers of the conference championship games shall select 29th and 30th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
4. The losers of the divisional playoff games shall select 25th through 28th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
5. The losers of the wild-card games shall select 21st through 24th based on won-lost-tied percentage.

If ties exist in any grouping except (2) above, such ties shall be broken by strength of schedule. If any ties cannot be broken by strength of schedule, the divisional or conference tiebreakers, if applicable, shall be applied. Any ties that still exist shall be broken by a coin flip.


Uh, OK.
I like eggs.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 12:15 pm
by Long Time Fan
NorthHawk wrote:
Uh, OK.
I like eggs.


Not meant to be rude, but then get on an egg forum. Or mb I just don't understand the point.

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:31 pm
by Zorn76
Looks like the Colts will be going full force (with the possible exception of Wayne) this week in Dallas.

The worst thing a team can do, generally speaking, is to give their starters too much rest before the playoffs. Maybe week 17, but not now. At least the news is encouraging, anyway.

http://espn.go.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:40 pm
by youdoit22
:D eggs

Re: Tie-Breakers Explained

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:48 pm
by mykc14
Zorn76 wrote:Looks like the Colts will be going full force (with the possible exception of Wayne) this week in Dallas.

The worst thing a team can do, generally speaking, is to give their starters too much rest before the playoffs. Maybe week 17, but not now. At least the news is encouraging, anyway.

http://espn.go.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/


I don't know why they wouldn't go full force. They are not locked in the number 3 spot they could still finish as any of the #1-4 seeds and the opportunity to fight for a first round bye and HFA far outweighs any sort of injury risk in the final 2 games.