c_hawkbob wrote:The rest of the NFC is hiding in their safe place right now. That was a frightning performance, offense and defense.
RiverDog wrote:Everyone is saying that if we win vs. the Rams, we have HFA, but no one has addressed the possibility of a Green Bay-Detroit tie, in which case both the Packers and Lions would be 11-4-1 and we would tie with the Cowboys with a 12-4 record, and the Cowboys beat us in head-to-head, so in that implausible scenario, would not the Cowboys get HFA?
jshawaii22 wrote:Facts from the Game:
Russell passed Luck as the all-time winningest QB in his first 3 years. They were tied.
js
Seahawks4Ever wrote:I know H. ain't automatic 50 yards and out so I wasn't surprised he missed that first one but to miss all three, and there being no wind, has me worried that maybe he has a slight muscle pull or maybe there is a problem with the long snapper to Ryan combo? Who is the LS any how? Well, since it was such an aberration I hope S.H. is going to bounce back and go back to being almost automatic.
What a job by the O-Line! Against a defense that previously had sacked RW 7 times and has a ferocious pass rush. Even Collinsworth couldn't say enough good things about them. It makes me wonder, should Bailey be starting for Okung the rest of the way? One thing that didn't happen yesterday was Okung picking up his usual two penalties he usually gets because he wasn't playing.
depaashaas wrote:It was a great game but WTH was up with Hauschka? I laughed so hard over the look on Carrols face when Hauschka missed his third, I don't think he ever missed 3 in an entire season. Don't want to talk to much trash about him or Jon Ryan and some of his buddies will beat me up at recess LOL http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/12/22/ ... tter-fight
RiverDog wrote:Everyone is saying that if we win vs. the Rams, we have HFA, but no one has addressed the possibility of a Green Bay-Detroit tie, in which case both the Packers and Lions would be 11-4-1 and we would tie with the Cowboys with a 12-4 record, and the Cowboys beat us in head-to-head, so in that implausible scenario, would not the Cowboys get HFA?
Long Time Fan wrote:What a great time it is to be a Seahawk's fan. This game encompassed so much of what this season has been; the slow start, the maddening penalties, the dominance that belies the first half score, RW's second half magic, the second half wear down of the opponent both offensively and defensively (Defenses are literally afraid of ML in the second half of games).
The stat that now 9 consecutive seahawks opponents have gone on to lose their next game is very telling of the beat down that opponent's experience.
Once again we find ourselves in the position of going to the SB, UNLESS someone can beat us at home. Lose at home? Not Bloody Likely!
HumanCockroach wrote:That's fine. The write ups I've seen always mention a tie could take the number one seed if Seattle wins the game, there isn't any real emphasis on it, nor do I think there should be. Baring an absolutely bizare circumstance, a Seahawks win, leads to the number one seed.
I really like backloading the schedule to provide for more divisional matchup. Lots of meaningful games these last few weeks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests