Hawktawk wrote:Kelly is a blithering idiot. Foles can play, has a big arm and is a humongous upgrade for a team that always gives Seattle a tough game. I hate it.
Zorn76 wrote:The Rams had to turn the page, and Foles doesn't scare me a bit.
SalmonBB wrote:Rams seem the clear winners on that deal. Foles has got some receiving weapons in Saint Louis ... I think he is a good fit there.
Only thing I see working for the Eagles is they get some draft picks back if Bradford doesn't start. With all the action going on in Philly, I can see them trading up still for Mariota, and either having Bradford start and give Mariotta some time - or have a quality back-up in Bradford.
GO SEAHAWKS!!!
kalibane wrote:What confuses me is that they gave up a potential 2nd round pick in addition to Foles. They at least got some injury protection so if Bradford doesn't start 8 games they keep the pick.
Still... as much as Foles doesn't scare me I wouldn't have given up a 2nd round pick for Bradford alone, much less throw in a QB to boot.
kalibane wrote:It's only an upgrade in the sense that usually Bradford is on the bench injured. I am not worried about Foles at all.
RiverDog wrote:I gotta side with Hawktalk on this one. Yea, Nick Foles doesn't strike fear into my heart in the same way a lot of other quarterbacks do. But the Rams definitely got the long end of the stick in this trade. They got themselves a quarterback with considerable starting experience and cleared a whole bunch of cap space in doing so. Even when the Rams were deploying no name journeyman quarterbacks, they still gave us fits. Not only have they stabilized the quarterback position, they have given themselves an opportunity to improve their team through free agency, they have a top 10 pick in this year's draft, and they will be playing a last place schedule. This is a team on the rise, and Nick Foles makes them better.
I'm still scratching my head trying to figure out what the heck Chip Kelly is up to.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests