Seahawks4Ever wrote:I am now over joyed that the Locker lovers didn't get their way and he never became a Seahawk. He will now enter the lexicon as an NFL BUST. I hope he has been smart with his money because other wise he has never been the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Sorry, but I saw a lot of Husky games when Locker was the QB and he was basically a poor man's Tim Tebow. Sure, he was more accurate than Tebow but with less leadership ability.
He lost his desire, that I can understand with all of his injuries he suffered. I have to wonder though, how much desire he ever had. Oh well, he will always be a God in Ferndale.
NorthHawk wrote:As a high draft pick that didn't live up to his selection, he is probably a bust.
However, I think injury should be a factor when making that determination as well as the team around him.
If we had seen Tom Brady or Dan Marino (or others) being injured a number of times early and missed in their development, they may never have been the QBs they are/were.
Injuries can be just bad luck and it happens to players so this is one of those cases where we will never know for sure how good (or bad) he could have been.
kalibane wrote:In fairness to Locker you can't use college stats. Tebow's performance in the NFL showed what a mirage his college stats were. In the actual NFL where the big boys play Locker completed 58.9% of his passes. Tebow completed 47.9% of his passes.
Locker isn't what I'd call an accurate QB but he's definitely more accurate than Tebow. And Tebow had a ton of problems. Accuracy being one of the biggest. There are all kinds of stories of him missing guys terribly in practice and he bounced balls all the time in the pros. The only reason he didn't rack up interceptions is because he was so inaccurate that a lot of times neither the receiver nor the defensive back covering him had any chance to catch the ball.
I mean seriously ... he completed less than half his passes. That was a bad percentage in the 60's.
Hawktawk wrote:Tebows accuracy went away when the *gurus* started messing with his mechanics prior to the draft. IMO he should have been left alone.He was a 70 percent passer in college.He was and is far superior to Locker and were I a GM Id be signing him before some of these sorry retreads who have never done a damn thing. I am a huge fan as you all know and wish Tebow nothing but the best in his attempt to land a spot on an NFL roster at the veteran combine.
As for Jake Locker I wish him well. As RD said, he was honest enough to admit he just didn't have it in him anymore rather than fleecing someone out of millions.
Good luck Jake. You were always a class act.
Hawktawk wrote:Tebows accuracy went away when the *gurus* started messing with his mechanics prior to the draft. IMO he should have been left alone.He was a 70 percent passer in college.He was and is far superior to Locker and were I a GM Id be signing him before some of these sorry retreads who have never done a damn thing. I am a huge fan as you all know and wish Tebow nothing but the best in his attempt to land a spot on an NFL roster at the veteran combine.
As for Jake Locker I wish him well. As RD said, he was honest enough to admit he just didn't have it in him anymore rather than fleecing someone out of millions.
Good luck Jake. You were always a class act.
Hawktawk wrote:I agree with both the last 2 posts. Tebow is as Kal said an excellent athlete and probably could have had success at any number of positions. But I give him credit for being true to who he is.
c_hawkbob wrote:Oh I don't. Mike Rob was a QB in college too, and he made himself a fine career in the NFL as a FB. A whole lotta college QB's go on to play other positions in the NFL, here are no Kudos to be had for refusing to even consider such a move and instead letting yourself become a running joke in NFL circles.
kalibane wrote:It was similar to the Seneca Wallace deal. He was willing to take some snaps elsewhere (personal punt protector) if that's what was required to maintain a roster spot but unwilling to switch his full time position group.
kalibane wrote:His full time position group was still QB. He was listed 4th on the depth chart when he was released.
kalibane wrote:It doesn't really matter to me anyway. It doesn't bother me in the slightest that Tebow was dead set on being a QB even if it cost him a gig in the NFL. The only thing that bugs me about Tebow are the insane fans that ignore the obvious lack of competency at the position, believe there is a league wide conspiracy theory against him, believe that he is entitled to 100 chances to catch on to an NFL team and that not even his well chronicled dismal practice performance should be taken into account. No Tebow should just be handed a starting job because he's a gamer and he proved it by throwing a 5 yard hitch that the receiver took 75 more yards for a TD.
kalibane wrote:Agreed... I don't have a problem with almost anything Tebow himself did. Good for him and his agent for maneuvering their way up to being a 1st round draft pick and basically cultivating such a following that he'll never lack for a job.
Tebow only did one thing that rubbed me the wrong way. That was when he complained to the press about Chris Simms being promoted to starter even though Tebow was 2nd on the depth chart. 1. That kind of thing should remain in the locker room. Publically he should be supporting his teammates. 2. When he was in Denver he was also raised from #3 to starter, making him a big time hypocrite.
Old but Slow wrote:Not sure how this became a Tebow thread, but so far as Jake Locker is concerned, I feel he was a guy who gave everything he had to his own detriment. Instead of protecting himself, he tried for the extra yard, and got injured. When he was a high school senior, he was all-state as a QB and as a safety. I felt at the time that he should be a defensive back, but he wanted to play the position, so he did. A great attitude, heart, and class. Good luck, Jake, in whatever you do.
BTW, thanks River for remembering my post. Jake is an icon here in the county, and there have been rumors (a friend talked to a friend who knows somebody who) that he would retire and go into the ministry. That would fit his profile, in my opinion.
kalibane wrote:Agreed... I don't have a problem with almost anything Tebow himself did. Good for him and his agent for maneuvering their way up to being a 1st round draft pick and basically cultivating such a following that he'll never lack for a job.
Tebow only did one thing that rubbed me the wrong way. That was when he complained to the press about Chris Simms being promoted to starter even though Tebow was 2nd on the depth chart. 1. That kind of thing should remain in the locker room. Publically he should be supporting his teammates. 2. When he was in Denver he was also raised from #3 to starter, making him a big time hypocrite.
NorthHawk wrote:Sorry for perpetuating this thread about Tebow, but according to PFT Chip Kelly is bringing him in for a workout.
Maybe he sees something that can work in his Offense.
Users browsing this forum: Stream Hawk and 30 guests