Vegaseahawk wrote:Harbaugh had a hand in building the niners D, but he took over midway through the rebuilding project that Mike Singletary had a hand in. And, yeah, he is a good coach, but let's not give him any undeserved credit for the roster he coaches today. Mike "Big Boy Pants" Singletary deserves at least some of the credit for the current strength of the team.
Zorn76 wrote:The 49ers would have been Beyond Stupid if, in fact, this rumor was true. As it is, I don't buy any of it.
FolkCrusader wrote:It's interesting to read the opinions here on who gets credit for the state of the 49ers. It's certainly not clear what exactly happened in this proposed trade and we may never know. There is enough smoke to know that some sort of a trade proposal did happen and it was approved on the 49ers end of the deal by ownership. Personally I think you can take away a couple things from the report;
1. Ownership values Trent Baalke over Jim Harbaugh.
2. Harbaugh wants either the money or power (or both) that goes with total control of the team.
3. Trent Baalke is not interested in sharing power.
Hairball has made his play, unless he can convince the Yorks that he should control the team they are on a bumpy road from here on out.
Personally I think there were good things in the trade for the Browns and the 49ers. The Browns desperately need real football leadership in their organization. If they feel Harbaugh can be that guy (think our Pete Carroll) than a draft pick or two is great compensation for him. Honestly, he couldn't fail any worse than the last three administrations there. Banner was an absolute joke who turned the team in to k mart. The Walrus did draft some good players, but he failed to bring in what was needed, a franchise QB. At the same time, the writing is now likely on the wall for the 49ers. These two stags are not going to coexist in the forest. Stags always fight eventually. One of them gets run off.
briwas101 wrote:There are good reasons why trades for coaches are rare, but this is one of the few times where it makes sense so I do believe the report is true.
When the coach and team are too far apart on salary, but the coach is high-profile enough to trade 1st rounders for and his new team meets his salary demands, that is the kind of situation where a trade makes sense.
It wouldn't surprise me if this was Baalke's way of saying, "you can have your money, but you have to coach in ohio to get it."
obiken wrote:Too bad, he didn't go where good coaches go to die!!
Zorn76 wrote:I still take Jed York's word over anybody having anything to do with the Browns, including their owner. I don't think this was ever close to getting done, and highly doubt it reached a point to where JH was told it was his decision to make.
If nothing else, Cleveland is merely trying to make themselves relevant by pushing this story, along with purposefully issuing vague remarks pertaining to SF's interest.
NorthHawk wrote:Whatever is going on, it sure is fun!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests