









FolkCrusader wrote:When Romo falls apart he just goes all the way.
kalibane wrote:
I want to see how they look when their WRs have to match up with Peterson, Cromartie and Honey Badger instead of just running through a soft zone all day, which is what Boldin in particular excels at. I can't say for sure they were bad but I wasn't particularly impressed either (exception of Hyde).
kalibane wrote:Cowboy's defense is so bad...
rottweiler wrote:[
I don't think they'll win more than four games this season.
jshawaii22 wrote:a little off track, but there are more 49er fans in Dallas than Dallas fans in Dallas. Romo looks bad. How much are they paying him?
js
kalibane wrote:Yeah we really won't be able to judge the 9ers offense fairly until the Cards game. And even then we need to see how the Cards deal with the loss of evertything up the middle. The Cowboys offense gifted them short fields all through the first half. And their coverage was horrendous. Guys were open by 3-5 yards on every single pass. Kaep didn't have to make any even moderately difficult throws.
Even still you can see Kaep is now going through his progressions better and Hyde looked really powerful and explosive. But on the other hand the Cowboys have no pass rushers but they were still getting pressure on Kaep, that offensive line looked really suspect and the 9ers didn't score at all in the 2nd half. I don't know how you don't score on that defense for 30 minutes.
It was also kind of funny that the 9ers got dinged for 3 illegal contact/defensive holding penalties, 1 offensive PI and 2 illegal hands to the face but supposedly the Seahawks were the ones in trouble due to the new emphasis.
I want to see how they look when their WRs have to match up with Peterson, Cromartie and Honey Badger instead of just running through a soft zone all day, which is what Boldin in particular excells at. I can't say for sure they were bad but I wasn't particularly impressed either (exception of Hyde).
I agree with this, but its hard to not give them at least some props for destroying another NFL team, even if it was one as bad as the cowboys.
The INTs that Romo threw had nothing to do with the 49ers coverage ability and everything to do with Romo forcing wildly innaccurate throws.
kalibane wrote:I would give them more credit if Tony Romo wasn't out there doing his best Matt Schaub impression.
jshawaii22 wrote:and for what it's worth, Eli Manning looked worse than Romo. That's two almost guaranteed wins coming up.
js
jshawaii22 wrote:and for what it's worth, Eli Manning looked worse than Romo. That's two almost guaranteed wins coming up.
js
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests