Uh, no Antonio ...

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby c_hawkbob » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:02 pm

... it's NOT OK to kick the other player in the face:

Image

Even if he is a punter ;)
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 7439
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby kalibane » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:11 pm

I think it might be okay :lol: :lol:
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby Seahawks4Ever » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:30 pm

What do you expect from a Stealer???
Seahawks4Ever
Legacy
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:56 pm

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby Zorn76 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:07 pm

Ohhhh, yea, that looks even worse in a Gif, lol.

He's looking at a nice fine.

Clearly intentional.
User avatar
Zorn76
Legacy
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:33 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby FolkCrusader » Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:41 pm

Probably should have been ejected, honestly.
FolkCrusader
Legacy
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby HumanCockroach » Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:45 pm

LOL. It wasn't "intentional" he went to hurdle the kicker, expecting him to come forward to make a tackle. He'll still get fined, but there is NO way someone can convince me he left the ground with the intention of karate kicking the kicker in the facemask. None.
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby FolkCrusader » Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:11 pm

HumanCockroach wrote:LOL. It wasn't "intentional" he went to hurdle the kicker, expecting him to come forward to make a tackle. He'll still get fined, but there is NO way someone can convince me he left the ground with the intention of karate kicking the kicker in the facemask. None.


I would totally agree with you, if he hadn't jack his foot in to his face. If he was trying to hurdle the foot would have went in one arc over his shoulder. He jacks his leg down in the the guys face.
FolkCrusader
Legacy
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby HumanCockroach » Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:22 pm

Not saying after he realised he wasn't going to make it, he kicked the guy ( kind of like the Such ball shot was intentional only after the fact) I don't believe for a second he went into the air with that intention, nor do I believe Suh had the intention initially of kicking the QB in the fruit basket, the thought that he left the ground planning on doing so is funny you simply don't have time to "plan" attacks on kickers prior to returning the ball. IMHO this is nothing more than an old axe to grind based on a fabricated belief the Steelers "stole" something from Seattle. They simply didn't.
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby burrrton » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:04 pm

Yeah, I think the natural motion if he was truly trying to hurdle the entire time would have been to continue lifting that right foot to get over.

Fine on the way.
User avatar
burrrton
Legacy
 
Posts: 4213
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby Distant Relative » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:12 pm

Surely a fine coming.
User avatar
Distant Relative
Legacy
 
Posts: 624
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:04 pm

Re: Uh, no Antonio ...

Postby RiverDog » Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:29 am

Jeez, I can tell the coffee hasn't had it's effect yet. Obviously not looking very closely at the thread title, I thought that the Raiders were not moving to San Antonio.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338


Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests