HawkShack.com

... it's NOT OK to kick the other player in the face:



Even if he is a punter

I think it might be okay

What do you expect from a Stealer???

Ohhhh, yea, that looks even worse in a Gif, lol.

He's looking at a nice fine.

Clearly intentional.

Probably should have been ejected, honestly.

LOL. It wasn't "intentional" he went to hurdle the kicker, expecting him to come forward to make a tackle. He'll still get fined, but there is NO way someone can convince me he left the ground with the intention of karate kicking the kicker in the facemask. None.

HumanCockroach wrote:LOL. It wasn't "intentional" he went to hurdle the kicker, expecting him to come forward to make a tackle. He'll still get fined, but there is NO way someone can convince me he left the ground with the intention of karate kicking the kicker in the facemask. None.

I would totally agree with you, if he hadn't jack his foot in to his face. If he was trying to hurdle the foot would have went in one arc over his shoulder. He jacks his leg down in the the guys face.

Not saying after he realised he wasn't going to make it, he kicked the guy ( kind of like the Such ball shot was intentional only after the fact) I don't believe for a second he went into the air with that intention, nor do I believe Suh had the intention initially of kicking the QB in the fruit basket, the thought that he left the ground planning on doing so is funny you simply don't have time to "plan" attacks on kickers prior to returning the ball. IMHO this is nothing more than an old axe to grind based on a fabricated belief the Steelers "stole" something from Seattle. They simply didn't.

Yeah, I think the natural motion if he was truly trying to hurdle the entire time would have been to continue lifting that right foot to get over.

Fine on the way.

Surely a fine coming.

Jeez, I can tell the coffee hasn't had it's effect yet. Obviously not looking very closely at the thread title, I thought that the Raiders were not moving to San Antonio.