But I didn't see and Chargers puking.
burrrton wrote:
They weren't puking- but they weren't getting IV fluids, either. Acclimation is a real phenomenon. Here's hoping that's all our issue was.
Hawktawk wrote:RD I think that was very warm even for San Diego. I heard someone say the average high for this time of year in SD is 87 degrees. Not cool but far from 110.It was a perfect storm if you will. But I didn't see and Chargers puking. I wonder if a few of the guys got a little sloppy with 11 days between games.
HumanCockroach wrote:$$$$$$$ money,money,money, MONEY$$$$$$ anyone still in the dark about why the NFL does things they do, need to do a bit more research. Or as Dillon said to Dutch "you're an asset, an expendable asset, and we used you to get the job done. Got it?"
FolkCrusader wrote:This is nonsense. The whole Cards team got fluid at the half, just like the hawks. Certain players had addition fluids as well. No football player is conditioned to lose 10-15 lbs of fluid in a game and still function.
This is very common in any hot region. Otherwise whole teams would be writhing in cramps before the end of the game.
burrrton wrote:Huh? The Cards played them in a dome (read: clime controlled), and I don't doubt that players occasionally have to take on fluids- I'm just pointing out that the heat had a disproportionate effect on Seattle vs the Chargers. San Diego players are demonstrably used to the heat and humidity (they didn't have to get IVs), while our players are demonstrably not (they *did* have to get IVs).
Hawktawk wrote:They wore their road whites and made Seattle take the home blue jerseys too, which might have been a 5 or more degree difference as well. White reflects and dark absorbs.It would make an interesting scientific study if it hasn't been done already
Hawktawk wrote:They wore their road whites and made Seattle take the home blue jerseys too, which might have been a 5 or more degree difference as well. White reflects and dark absorbs.It would make an interesting scientific study if it hasn't been done already
Hawktown wrote:
I have no idea if San Diego's players got fluids or not but i do not recall seeing it during the game and i would assume that they are FAR more used to their conditions than we are and in turn, San Diego had the advantage of the conditions by a long shot.
HumanCockroach wrote:You sir, have gone from zero to troll pretty damn quick on this one. You might want to check yourself on this one ( if for no other reason than the claim of 40 degree drizzly, noise designed stadium is an outright lie.... again. It's called a "roof" jackalope, and maybe the geniuses that designed the abortion to house fans in Santa Clara, should have looked into one, considering the amount of heat stroke floating around that stadium, hell, one "faithful" died in his damn seat. In Seattle we use it for all sorts of things, like SHADE, and on the RARE occation it does drizzle during a game, which is by the way, a LOWER percentage than it did in numerous places INCLUDING that abortion you guys used to play in, it keeps us dry.)
You can skip the "when teams hafta" crap and shove it up your a%$. The FANS make the noise tool, and the weather as a whole is BETTER in Seattle, than places like Florida ( torrential rains, hurricanes and the like) Denver, GB,NYC,KC etc. The list is long big guy, and this is simply a way for you to spout off.I've provided you with the stats before ( sure they were ignored) back in the Elway doesn't want to play in inclement weather ( what an idiot that claim was) and I'm not doing the providing again, but maybe you should actually look something up, before spewing your LIES yet again, especially in a case such as this. I mean I know it's hard to resist and all, because 'perception' no matter how IGNORANT is obviously correct in your world.
HumanCockroach wrote:This is a common practice. It is why Dallas typically wears white at home, why Carolina wore "away"jerseys last season, why the Jags wore their whites in '05 and so on. It does give the home team an advantage ( even if it is a slight one) and has been a common practice for a long, long time. Even a "slight" advantage like that can sway a game, but it is what it is. I'm sure Seattle knew they would be wearing the blue, before the week started.
Can't fault them for the choice, if Seattle had the weather as an ally, and could use the uniforms of the other team as an edge, I would fully expect them to do so in each and every home game.
Futureite wrote:Good fn god San Diego has year round moderate temps around 70 degrees. As if this was some advantage for the Chargers. I am reading these complaints about the heat on every website. Just fn ridiculous. Every damn team has to come up to play in that often drizzly 40 degree weather in Seattle in a stadium that was constructed specifically to reflect noise back at the opposing team. But you brag about that homefield advantage. Maybe you ought to consider that before complaining about abnormal temps that were equally foreign to Charger's players.
River, how about this: your D got thoroughly worked on national TV. My Niners also emberrased themselves and Kap singlehandedly gave a game away V a bad team. See, it's not that hard to just admit the truth.
Could turn out that neither team ends up being as good as we hoped. That's life. Tired of reading these lame excuses.
All players (both teams) were getting supplemental fluids in those conditions.
burrrton wrote:
I find that easy to believe, but are you saying literally not a single article on the game mentioned that all players were taking IVs (not just Seattle players)? Or maybe you have some links that mention it that I haven't seen?
Honest request (not snarky).
Futureite wrote:Good fn god San Diego has year round moderate temps around 70 degrees. As if this was some advantage for the Chargers. I am reading these complaints about the heat on every website. Just fn ridiculous. Every damn team has to come up to play in that often drizzly 40 degree weather in Seattle in a stadium that was constructed specifically to reflect noise back at the opposing team. But you brag about that homefield advantage. Maybe you ought to consider that before complaining about abnormal temps that were equally foreign to Charger's players.
River, how about this: your D got thoroughly worked on national TV. My Niners also emberrased themselves and Kap singlehandedly gave a game away V a bad team. See, it's not that hard to just admit the truth.
Could turn out that neither team ends up being as good as we hoped. That's life. Tired of reading these lame excuses.
burrrton wrote:Thanks, Folk. Interesting that such a big deal was made of our guys, when it appears it was SOP.
Oh well- guess we'll see on Sunday.
NorthHawk wrote:The weather forecast is mid 80's for Sundays game.
So much for always raining in Seattle...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests