kalibane wrote:He won't be gone unless there continues to be public pressure or pressure from sponsors. The "independent" investigation is a stall tactic. The owners like Goodell and they are counting on the furor dying down, they'll find that Goodell never saw the tape and there is not enough evidence to justify termination.
I just think he should go. The unnecessary destruction of the Spy Gate tapes that just foster conspiracy theory, mismanaged the concussion thing, mismanaged the referees, and this domestic abuse issue has been an absolute debacle. Neither the fans nor the players trust him at all.
I don't get why they are so attached to him. He's really not responsible for the increased ratings or money. Those increases were just a freight train that he hopped on half way to its destination. From what I've heard the TV deal negotiations are a joke... basically it's "here's our price, if you won't meet it there is another network who wants the package". A trained monkey could do that. The only thing I can figure is that they just like having a lackey in that position because there is no risk that he'll do something that he feels is for the good of the game that doesn't also serve the immediate needs of the owners.
Show me the consistency you yearn for in the application of these two cases.kalibane wrote:That's what gets me is the total inconsistancy with punishment.
kalibane wrote: He handled turning himself in and there has to be due process.
kalibane wrote: Different fronte offices
HumanCockroach wrote:I really don't see this as any different from thousands of business' that apply a similar approach with their employees. I know drivers get put on "paid leave pending investigation" anytime there is an accident ( they call them incidents however) and it doesn't matter if that driver is in anyway responsible or not for the "incident". They are NOT forfeiting their pay, nor are they being found guilty, but until the matter is resolved, they aren't "plying their trade" either.
Peterson can be cut for ANY reason the Vikings see fit, they didn't do so, they gave him a mandatory "leave of absence" to resolve his legal and personal matters, which IMO happens quite often amongst regular business' . The NFL is an at will business, and NO player "needs" a reason to be "fired" ( cut) much less some "due process" to do so.
People can complain about it but that is simply the way the NFL, and pretty much any business is set up. If they had suspended him without pay, he would have some form of retaliation if he so chose, but they didn't, he agreed to it, so where's the issue? I'm not seeing it, just am not.
HumanCockroach wrote:Fair enough, but us working Joes also aren't being compensated in the same manner. You can't have everything you want in life, even if you are currently the best running back in the game. I'm not going to shed a tear for someone that put themselves in this situation to begin with. That sucks for Peterson, and Rice etc, but I find it hard to feel like they should live by a different set of rules than the rest of us. Never been keen on that, and this situation isn't pushing me any closer to that road :
And yes I understand that you didn't say I should pity Peterson, just voicing my view on it.
No one knows they have forty years to ply their trade ( especially not cops), the only difference I see personally, is Peterson is chasing records, and accolades, while us average Joes are making the world turn. Bummer if he doesn't accomplish what he wanted and all, but I guess he shouldn't have beaten his four year old.
I have to say, though, as much as all of that is worth him getting canned, I'd be lying if I said that a big part of my wanting him to go has to do with his attempt to turn the NFL into flag football. I'm all for new regulations that protect the head, but he has gone so over the top that it's ruining the game.
kalibane wrote:Legit concerns River. The way I see it, individual teams have to protect their own brand and that's why you're seeing the Vikings and Cards handling it this way. Just another by-product of Goodell and the league office not having a uniform policy for their personal conduct violations.
RiverDog wrote: I have to tip my hat to the 49'ers. There's been a lot of pressure on them to sit Ray McDonald, but he has not even been charged and the Niners say that they believe his side of the story, so they're standing by him. After all the flak they rightfully took for playing Aldon Smith (which IMO they shouldn't have played him), it takes a lot of balls to stand up against this stampede of blood thirsty fans and media. If the Niners are wrong and McDonald is charged and found guilty, the Niners are going to have a lot of egg on their face.
At this point, I don't think it makes a lot of difference whether or not Goodell is directly to blame for any of this. He has to go.
Goodell is going nowhere.
c_hawkbob wrote:
I'll take that bet.
Long Time Fan wrote:I would have to think that each team consults with the NFL before taking on a position.
c_hawkbob wrote:Even though I think it'll happen by season's end it seems a reasonable offseason move, how bout we make it by training camp next year?
Steaks are fine by me if you don't mind mail order meats (Omaha Steaks Ribeys maybe): http://www.omahasteaks.com/products/Ribeyes (I live in KY so we'd have to do this long distance).
Or we could go with a bottle of Wild Turkey: http://send.com/liquor/cat.php?list=31& ... SortOrder= vs. your choice of comparably priced spirit.
Long Time Fan wrote:http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7Bsg/jim-beam-make-history-featuring-mila-kunis
Kentucky huh? If you see this girl out your way send her, if not beam will have to do.
I'm in Houston, plenty of turkey here, not enough Kunis.
kalibane wrote:Bob... you're in KY, have you done the bourbon trail?
burrrton wrote:http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/nfl-controversy/exclusive-america-shrugs-scandals-plaguing-nfl-nbc-poll-reveals-n206676
Advantage: Long Time Fan.
(I have no dog in this fight, btw, and am not predicting a winner- just thought it was an interesting article)
c_hawkbob wrote:That's a fan poll. I'll worry when I see a sponsor poll that says the same thing. Money talks.
burrrton wrote:Good point (although I'm guessing sponsor dollars will follow fan opinion pretty closely).
c_hawkbob wrote:
I haven't, I quit riding when I broke by back in '90. Just being in that position sets my legs on fire.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests