Feez wrote:is there any way to change the avatar size restrictions? i have tried several time to resize pictures and no matter what I do they are too large
makena wrote:Feez wrote:is there any way to change the avatar size restrictions? i have tried several time to resize pictures and no matter what I do they are too large
We can change the size. In windows, if you go to your avatar image and right click it --> Details tab --> and the image section will tell you the pixal size of the avatar. Let me know what it is and I'll chat with yoder to see if we can increase the size ... that is if it is possible based on the bulletin boards database restriction.
rottweiler wrote:This is just so frick'n awesome, yoder my man (woman? bird?).
The past two weeks, I've acquired just over 200 posts at hawks.net, and despite the fact that I've bumped back into Greg (i.e. "Irish Greg") for the first time in three or more years — and some other long-lost PI Forum refugees — it really hasn't been much fun.
I'm very familiar with BBCode; I'm fairly confident in saying that I know how to do just about everything on it. But even so, all the neat stuff that a given site allows its participants to do doesn't mean jack-squattin'-on-a-rott with regard to how fun the site can be if there's no sense of community, no sense of family there.
In a nutshell, that, to me, is the essence of hawks.net: the opportunity, the capability to do a whole bunch of cool stuff, none of which is very fun only because there, I just feel so alone.
I guess I'm just set in my ways. Can't teach an old dogg new tricks, so they say, eh?
These are my people, and this is my home.
Rott of Ages.
Like others have said on this very thread, I also love this site because it's simplistic, the ways we navigate through and on it. Ghetto, in street-speak, this site.
There isn't a whole lot going on here in terms of design and/ or features, and — as an old-skewler who more often than not finds himself adrift in heavenly pleasant, lucid daydreams about the good ole days of the PI Forum's old format (before it sucker-punched us by adopting the Facebook milieu in April of 2011) when he's posting on hawks.net, and just trying to see his paw in front of his face amid that site's annoyingly enshrouding neon (I'd use the word Byzantine right here, 'cept I'm trying to start doing my time here by consciously not being too wordy, too pedantic) gaudiness — that's exacly the way I like it.
Based exclusively on what I've read from others on this thread, I know I'm not alone when I say that I personally think the black-and-white simplicity of this site is in and of itself one of its most beautiful attributes.
And again, then there's this site's people. My family.
This is my home, and I love it.
Thank you so much for taking the time to create and maintain it, yoder my beloved friend.
rottweiler wrote:This is just so frick'n awesome, yoder my man (woman? bird?).
The past two weeks, I've acquired just over 200 posts at hawks.net, and despite the fact that I've bumped back into Greg (i.e. "Irish Greg") for the first time in three or more years — and some other long-lost PI Forum refugees — it really hasn't been much fun.
I'm very familiar with BBCode; I'm fairly confident in saying that I know how to do just about everything on it. But even so, all the neat stuff that a given site allows its participants to do doesn't mean jack-squattin'-on-a-rott with regard to how fun the site can be if there's no sense of community, no sense of family there.
In a nutshell, that, to me, is the essence of hawks.net: the opportunity, the capability to do a whole bunch of cool stuff, none of which is very fun only because there, I just feel so alone.
I guess I'm just set in my ways. Can't teach an old dogg new tricks, so they say, eh?
These are my people, and this is my home.
Rott of Ages.
Like others have said on this very thread, I also love this site because it's simplistic, the ways we navigate through and on it. Ghetto, in street-speak, this site.
There isn't a whole lot going on here in terms of design and/ or features, and — as an old-skewler who more often than not finds himself adrift in heavenly pleasant, lucid daydreams about the good ole days of the PI Forum's old format (before it sucker-punched us by adopting the Facebook milieu in April of 2011) when he's posting on hawks.net, and just trying to see his paw in front of his face amid that site's annoyingly enshrouding neon (I'd use the word Byzantine right here, 'cept I'm trying to start doing my time here by consciously not being too wordy, too pedantic) gaudiness — that's exacly the way I like it.
Based exclusively on what I've read from others on this thread, I know I'm not alone when I say that I personally think the black-and-white simplicity of this site is in and of itself one of its most beautiful attributes.
And again, then there's this site's people. My family.
This is my home, and I love it.
Thank you so much for taking the time to create and maintain it, yoder my beloved friend.
yoder wrote:Yup, I'm thinking about it. Maybe a OT forum, Huskies, etc. I might put it up to a vote once we get a few more members rolling in. Thanks for the thoughts!
Oly wrote:Some things from the thread in the main forum that I like:
Please keep it simple! I hate the extras that make it so that you only see 2 posts per page (I'm exaggerating, of course, but you get the gist).
I'll second RD's suggestion of a method of notifying you of threads you've posted in.
Another suggestion: allow us to increase the number of posts displayed on a page. I always go for the max and would be fine with 100 posts per page, as long as you have a button that takes you directly to the first unread post. I like it more than having to click "Next" all the time.
One more: you need a favicon.
Thanks!
Tikus wrote:What is an OT forum? Personally I'm waiting for a political forum so I can start posting.
RiverDog wrote:As far as off topic threads go, I don't mind them being in the general forum, at least during the offseason, but they can be a distraction to those that simply want to talk Seahawks football.
Tikus wrote:Well, as expected, this is apparently just for people interested in yammering about sports. After waiting a month for the very simple inclusion of a political forum, which definitely would not interfere with the sports threads, I can see that's not going to happen. I already doubted that it would but I thought I would at least give it a chance.
So long folks. You're empty and pointless sports talk is of little value to me or the country. There are so many far more important things going on in the world. Apparently this corner of the world is only interested in pointless games played by vastly over-rated jocks. Enjoy your isolation.
Tikus wrote:Well, as expected, this is apparently just for people interested in yammering about sports. After waiting a month for the very simple inclusion of a political forum, which definitely would not interfere with the sports threads, I can see that's not going to happen. I already doubted that it would but I thought I would at least give it a chance.
So long folks. You're empty and pointless sports talk is of little value to me or the country. There are so many far more important things going on in the world. Apparently this corner of the world is only interested in pointless games played by vastly over-rated jocks. Enjoy your isolation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest