And BTW, latest news is that the three boys still in Brazil have been released after promising further cooperation with authorities.
burrrton wrote:Good to hear. Hadn't seen anything this morning yet.
burrrton wrote:Reading now that Lochte said the cab wasn't 'pulled over', but instead they were robbed after stopping at a gas station.
burrrton wrote:Not sure it's worth revisiting, but it sounds like this isn't such a cut-and-dry case of Lochte lying:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ol ... /89082232/
"At a news conference Thursday, Rio police chief Fernando Veloso characterized the athletes' actions at the gas station as vandalism. He said they also had broken a soap dispenser and mirror inside the restroom. Reports quickly grew that the Americans had trashed the restroom.
A USA TODAY Sports videographer who visited the bathroom Thursday found no damage to soap dispensers and mirrors and said none of those items appeared to be new. Some media accounts suggested the men had broken down a door, which USA TODAY Sports also did not observe."
burrrton wrote:I don't recall him saying he completely fabricated the story, only exaggerated it (I think there's a difference). And I think when you read the entire account, this looks like Brazillian authorities did a LOT of CYA to hide the swimmers getting shaken down by a couple of security guards.
It *is* still embarrassing to us, but that's in large part due to the old "a lie makes it halfway around the world before the truth puts on its shoes", both for Lochte's story and now for Brazil's BS.
It'll be interesting to see how much play this gets compared to what his exaggeration got.
c_hawkbob wrote:He took what should have been a minor embarrassment that would have much more appropriately lived on only as a story between old friends reminiscing about the stupid things they used to do and turned it into an international incident because he just had to tell the stories to anyone that would listen, a little more extreme and with himself more the heroic tough guy with each telling.
The whole thing was childish and ridiculous and the amount of fibbing or "over exaggerating" that went on is as irrelevant at the air pressure in Tom Brady's balls.
He's a 32 year old man that was hanging out with kids acting the fool to impress them and when sh!t got serious he bailed on them! He left his buddies holding the bag while he got the hell outa Dodge ...
Lyin' Ryan's name is dirt and it deserves to be.
burrrton wrote:I have no problem beating up Lochte- it's just obvious now that the Brazillian 'authorities' weren't the slandered victims the story had morphed them into once it was obvious Lochte wasn't the victim he purported himself to be.
And yeah, bailing on your teammates in a situation like that is almost comically chicken-sht.
And I disagree that the Brazilians weren't slandered victims.
c_hawkbob wrote:I don't think you can say they didn't trash the bathroom any more than you can say they did kick the door off the hinges. I don't think the stories from either side are accurate (or at least verifiable) enough to draw such definite conclusions.
burrrton wrote:Saying "banana republics will be banana republics" doesn't get 'Brazil' off the hook any more than saying "boys will be boys" gets Lochte et al off the hook.
The security guards were just doing what they do, it wasn't anything exceptional for that society.
burrrton wrote:Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that they *did* 'do what they do', Lochte *didn't* just invent a story whole-cloth, and the Brazilian authorities lied at least as much as he did, if not more.
RiverDog wrote:But Lochte (and the other swimmers) started it. They were the ones that 'threw the first punch', so to speak. They don't misbehave and nothing happens. Plus they were Brazil's guests, and representing the red, white, and blue. I'll call out our guys and let the Brazilians take care of their own problems.
burrrton wrote:I see your point, but if you're going to dismiss shaking down foreign athletes for money at gunpoint as just something third-world banana republics do, couldn't the same be said for Lochte and friends as just something drunk guys will do?
To be clear, I'm not inclined to do either, but if I was inclined to give one of them a pass as you seem to be, I think I'd have to do the same for both.
It's apparent now there were no innocent parties here.
I'm not dismissing anything or giving the Brazilians a pass.
I'm much more inclined to blame the Americans than I am the host country.
Our only disagreement we have is in how much blame each party gets.
burrrton wrote:Right, but your rationale for not giving Brazil much blame is essentially "that's what third-world banana republics do", and I'm not sure that's very solid rationale for letting them off the hook.
RiverDog wrote:But given the current state of affairs, I cannot assign the same degree of blame on the Brazilians as I do the Americans.
burrrton wrote:But the current state of affairs is that Lochte *was* essentially shaken down for money at gunpoint, and the bathroom *wasn't* trashed.
Lochte's lies didn't slander any entity unfairly, merely exaggerating the actual situation (they didn't take their wallets, etc), but the Brazilian authorities' lies were completely made up and designed to trash the swimmers' reputations and get 'Rio' off the hook (the swimmers didn't trash a bathroom, break down a door, etc).
I don't know- it's water under the bridge now- I'm just not sure I can spread the blame as unevenly given those facts.
[edit]
Wanted to add: this is all based on what I *think* we know for sure now. I won't be surprised at all if we find out in the coming weeks that there is more to the story, either in Lochte's favor or Rio's, so I reserve the right to go Emily Litella if necessary.
RiverDog wrote:But there is one fact that we know won't change: Lochte and the others were guests in a foreign country.
burrrton wrote:Yup, and none of it would have happened had they not been out being drunk kids.
That (and him saying they took their wallets when they hadn't, etc) is why I'm willing to lay half the blame at his feet.
RiverDog wrote:One other fact I forgot to mention: Lochte is 32 years old. You can't write it off as his just being a drunk kid. He should have stepped up and taken responsibility and he didn't, thus he forced the Brazilians into a defensive position, of which they handled poorly. Once again, more blame on the Americans vs. the Brazilians.
c_hawkbob wrote: He's a 32 year old man that was hanging out with kids acting the fool to impress them and when sh!t got serious he bailed on them! He left his buddies holding the bag while he got the hell outa Dodge ...
Lyin' Ryan's name is dirt and it deserves to be.
c_hawkbob wrote:It (Lochte's age) wasn't totally overlooked in this thread:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests