c_hawkbob wrote:I dunno man, this is pretty political. He's very obviously taking his cues from a very political (and divisive) individual.
I never had much of an opinion on the guy but I do now, and it ain't good.
burrrton wrote:1. Leach is a weird, weird guy- College Gameday sign: "OUR COACH IS WEIRDER THAN YOUR COACH!"
2. He deleted the retweet eventually, probably after he realized he'd (unsurprisingly) been duped.
3. The "lost $" wasn't lost $.
4. It wasn't *Leach's* faked video.
5. Did anyone think Leach was a big Obama fan?
This is like the kerfuffle about Pete being a 9-11 Truther.
jshawaii22 wrote:Come on RD... you real think Mike Leach was duped into believing it was 'real' news???
This guy is extremely smart, college degree and probably a masters to get this level of coaching job at a State institution. He knew what he had. Maybe he didn't realize the other side of the coin would bite him in the toosh, but he's always been a FOXey kind of guy and lucky he didn't lose his job in your extreme liberal state.
If anything, the power of the internet continues to show how petty people are. You're going to take away $$$ from an institution after you die because of something a Football coach poops on the internet? Get Real People
lucky he didn't lose his job in your extreme liberal state.
I don't think he ever realized he had been duped.
I don't know the details about the pledges that were withdrawn after news of this hit.
Compared to the stuff the POSOTUS tweets out daily it's trivial.
burrrton wrote:I don't think he ever realized he had been duped.
Fair, but the point is he did delete it whether he fully believes it or not.
This is the basis for the whole article, apparently:
“As the president mentioned, no one who had made a cash gift has asked for their money back. We did have five donors let us know that they had altered plans for their future giving, however. These were primarily estate gifts that would have been paid out upon the donor’s death. These planned estate gifts totaled $1.6 million.”
Hawktawk wrote:Compared to the stuff the POSOTUS tweets out daily it's trivial. It might have cost WSU a few million now but there are plenty of deep pocketed like minded individuals in the deep red eastern portion of the state who will likely make up the difference ASAP. At least he's a winner.
I care a lot more about politicians political beliefs and behaviors than football coaches...
burrrton wrote:
Thanks for announcing to everyone in an unrelated thread that Trump still gives you a boner. We were wondering.
RiverDog wrote:Hawktalk would you please wait until we can get the thread moved to off topic before you start talking politics. Some posters don't like these types of discussions in a football forum. I only started it here to get the takes of some of our great football minds like JS and have asked that it be moved.
trents wrote:The school may have lost 1.6 mil from some donors but they might pick up that much or more from donors on the right side (excuse the pun) of the political divide.
Also, to put this in perspective, what's the big deal? We just got through watch months of television news and commercials that repeatedly took things out of context said by candidates on both sides of the political divide and no one bats an eye.
trents wrote:But school officials already stated that Leach as a private citizen has a right to express his opinion just as anyone else does. It would have been different had he postured himself as speaking for the school. Otherwise, you would have to conclude that anyone on the government dole cannot tweet a personal opinion and so does not have first amendment rights. I would admit, however, it might not have been a smart thing to do so in his situation.
EmeraldBullet wrote:I'm going to bed cause I have to work early tomorrow, but this thread is interesting to me. What you say and do matters at WSU. Political or not, if the donors don't agree with you, youre job can disappear pretty quick. Just look at Rob Wielgus and his story. Not saying this is the same thing, Leach completely turned around a depleted program. Helz, this year was supposed to be a rebuilding year with a no name rental qb according to the analysts at the start of the season. It's interesting to me how if someone says something others disagree with, their entire career is destroyed despite everything they have accomplished for the program letting them go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests