HumanCockroach wrote:Honestly, I don't really understand the IR process, he was designated cut/IR but some players go straight to IR without the "cut" designation? NE claimed a RB this way, and there was a stink about it. Does it save the team money to make those players available first? Or is every IR situation handled that way and we just don't hear about it? ( I kind of doubt that, otherwise pro bowlers would be available every time they went on IR like Bowman). Could someone clarify how or more importantly WHY a team would do it one way or another?
Zorn76 wrote:Oops.
Then again, if we can win a SB with last year's OL, anything's possible:)
Maybe we end up with a decent prospect from another team after cuts, but that's hardly a plan.
RiverDog wrote:Zorn76 wrote:Oops.
Then again, if we can win a SB with last year's OL, anything's possible:)
Maybe we end up with a decent prospect from another team after cuts, but that's hardly a plan.
Unless a couple players rise to the occasion, like Carpenter and Britt/Winston, this OL could very well be worse than last season's. It certainly doesn't look good on paper.
NorthHawk wrote:Losing Bowie could be because of a number of factors, not the least of which might just be a mistake by JS/PC.
savvyman wrote:Time to move to Plan B for the Offensive Line?
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/article-1/Browns-awarded-Michael-Bowie-via-waivers/7949dde9-ca58-419b-ab6a-677de05a7b54
I think I forgot - What exactly is Plan B?
Is it 1-800-CallaOffensiveLineman?
Users browsing this forum: Aseahawkfan and 18 guests