Alex Smith and The Kansas City Chiefs reportedly agree on a new contract that includes $45 million in guarantees
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1916 ... s-reaction
Alex Smith and The Kansas City Chiefs reportedly agree on a new contract that includes $45 million in guarantees
c_hawkbob wrote:Alex Smith and The Kansas City Chiefs reportedly agree on a new contract that includes $45 million in guarantees
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1916 ... s-reaction
Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
HumanCockroach wrote:Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
A lot of people did indeed say that, many of which are experts on the negotiations and the NFL, I fail to see how this "proves"anything different? Is Smith playing in Santa Clara? Do they have the same agent? FO personnel, Coach perhaps? No? Than how in the world are they comparable? That is like me claiming Kap and Dalton are the same, because Cincy did a similar contract , does that mean Dalton all of a sudden gave a "great" deal and the Bengals also, are 100% sold on him as the QB of the future?
Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.
HumanCockroach wrote:Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
A lot of people did indeed say that, many of which are experts on the negotiations and the NFL, I fail to see how this "proves"anything different? Is Smith playing in Santa Clara? Do they have the same agent? FO personnel, Coach perhaps? No? Than how in the world are they comparable? That is like me claiming Kap and Dalton are the same, because Cincy did a similar contract , does that mean Dalton all of a sudden gave a "great" deal and the Bengals also, are 100% sold on him as the QB of the future?
Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.
Anthony wrote:HumanCockroach wrote:Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
A lot of people did indeed say that, many of which are experts on the negotiations and the NFL, I fail to see how this "proves"anything different? Is Smith playing in Santa Clara? Do they have the same agent? FO personnel, Coach perhaps? No? Than how in the world are they comparable? That is like me claiming Kap and Dalton are the same, because Cincy did a similar contract , does that mean Dalton all of a sudden gave a "great" deal and the Bengals also, are 100% sold on him as the QB of the future?
Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.
LOL yup you summed it up, Future always looking for an angle and always wrong.
Old but Slow wrote:Was it Micky Mantle who signed the first contract for $100,000? The pundits at the time said it would destroy baseball to pay a player that much.
Alex Rodrigues left the Mariners to sign with Texas for $250,000,000. Did baseball die?
Athlete salaries are not reality. They are clouds that bend light. There is no connection to what is concrete in what is paid to athletes, actors, singers, anchormen. Attaching value to men (or women) who who represent money to media people is not meaningful. It is not touchdowns, or running yards that add value solely, it is also intrigue, mystery, scandal, and elusive qualities that the person (they are all just people, after all) emanates.
Even our own. Russell Wilson with his dedication. Richard Sherman with his audacity. It produces money. Not that that is a bad thing, more power to them, but lets recognize what it is.
The money will flow, but, trust, that the money will not flow beyond what management thinks will work.
Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
c_hawkbob wrote:If you want to talk about trust, Alex is a more trustworthy QB than Kap.
He can be trusted not to make poor decisions, he can be trusted not to take unnecessary chances with his safety or that of his receivers, he can be trusted to run the exact offense his HC intends the way it's drawn up. He can be trusted put an acceptable corporate image in front of the press.
These are things valued by his current coach and organization.
His previous coach and organization chose to let him walk in favor of the almost ridiculous upside potential of a more spectacular athlete at the position. An organization less concerned with trustworthiness than what could be. An organization willing to take the greater chance of failure that came with the possibilities of greater success.
Alex got more guaranteed than Kap because Kap hasn't delivered yet on all that upside whereas Alex has delivered more that was expected of him and can be trusted to keep on doing the same.
HumanCockroach wrote:You should read it again Future, as you missed the entire point..
'Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.'
Futureite wrote:c_hawkbob wrote:If you want to talk about trust, Alex is a more trustworthy QB than Kap.
He can be trusted not to make poor decisions, he can be trusted not to take unnecessary chances with his safety or that of his receivers, he can be trusted to run the exact offense his HC intends the way it's drawn up. He can be trusted put an acceptable corporate image in front of the press.
These are things valued by his current coach and organization.
His previous coach and organization chose to let him walk in favor of the almost ridiculous upside potential of a more spectacular athlete at the position. An organization less concerned with trustworthiness than what could be. An organization willing to take the greater chance of failure that came with the possibilities of greater success.
Alex got more guaranteed than Kap because Kap hasn't delivered yet on all that upside whereas Alex has delivered more that was expected of him and can be trusted to keep on doing the same.
Well those are all valid points Bob, but the only problem is the NFL doesn't pay 3-4 times the money for trustworthiness. Players are paid for talent and production, and by any objective measure the two are comparable in both. In fact, majority opinion has Kaep rated higher than Alex.
If there were some value attached to trustworthiness I guarantee it's not 3-4 times that of "upside". Considering the two guys have thrown nearly the exact same number of ints over the past 1.5 yrs, I am not sure how much merit that position holds in the first place.
Bottom line is the market just demonstrated what a 15ish (or less) rated QB garners in guranteed money. All agents will now use this as an arguing point for their player. Unless of course the player intentionally requests a different structure. Which is what Kaep said he would do before his negotiations and has maintained he did do after he signed the contract.
Futureite wrote:HumanCockroach wrote:You should read it again Future, as you missed the entire point..
'Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.'
I read it through the first time. Smith's contract means Kaep could have sought the same money, at minimum. Be it with the 49ers or another team. That is now an established fact.
RiverDog wrote:Futureite wrote:c_hawkbob wrote:If you want to talk about trust, Alex is a more trustworthy QB than Kap.
He can be trusted not to make poor decisions, he can be trusted not to take unnecessary chances with his safety or that of his receivers, he can be trusted to run the exact offense his HC intends the way it's drawn up. He can be trusted put an acceptable corporate image in front of the press.
These are things valued by his current coach and organization.
His previous coach and organization chose to let him walk in favor of the almost ridiculous upside potential of a more spectacular athlete at the position. An organization less concerned with trustworthiness than what could be. An organization willing to take the greater chance of failure that came with the possibilities of greater success.
Alex got more guaranteed than Kap because Kap hasn't delivered yet on all that upside whereas Alex has delivered more that was expected of him and can be trusted to keep on doing the same.
Well those are all valid points Bob, but the only problem is the NFL doesn't pay 3-4 times the money for trustworthiness. Players are paid for talent and production, and by any objective measure the two are comparable in both. In fact, majority opinion has Kaep rated higher than Alex.
If there were some value attached to trustworthiness I guarantee it's not 3-4 times that of "upside". Considering the two guys have thrown nearly the exact same number of ints over the past 1.5 yrs, I am not sure how much merit that position holds in the first place.
Bottom line is the market just demonstrated what a 15ish (or less) rated QB garners in guranteed money. All agents will now use this as an arguing point for their player. Unless of course the player intentionally requests a different structure. Which is what Kaep said he would do before his negotiations and has maintained he did do after he signed the contract.
They are paid based on the market for their services, which could be quite different from their talent and productivity. For example, Russell Wilson may not have the talent and productivity as a quarterback like Peyton Manning, but due to the difference in age, the market for Russell could be quite different from that of Manning.
Futureite wrote:RiverDog wrote:Futureite wrote:You all have done a complete 180 on this issue. Before the contract we were going to pay him at least $20 mil because Romo and Cutler got that, snd Kaep had all the leverage. Remember those comnents? After the contract was done your opinion shifted to "49ers don't trust him".
All this constant talk about integrity and not one person here can admit what they said before and after. And now I am listening to you guys talk up the value of a player in Alex Smith that I've literally read you dis since oh, 2011. I believe you all believed T'Jack was about the same grade st that time.
Kap is not worth what Alex is. No one would've paid him that. Right. What hypocritical homer bullshit this is. I should come to learn that 95% of you are never going to just admit you were wrong. It would kill you to admit Kaep is a team guy like good ol' Russ. Just ruins the good v evil theme.
Futureite wrote: .
Eh, go take an economics class kid.
c_hawkbob wrote:If you want to talk about trust, Alex is a more trustworthy QB than Kap.
He can be trusted not to make poor decisions, he can be trusted not to take unnecessary chances with his safety or that of his receivers, he can be trusted to run the exact offense his HC intends the way it's drawn up. He can be trusted put an acceptable corporate image in front of the press.
These are things valued by his current coach and organization.
His previous coach and organization chose to let him walk in favor of the almost ridiculous upside potential of a more spectacular athlete at the position. An organization less concerned with trustworthiness than what could be. An organization willing to take the greater chance of failure that came with the possibilities of greater success.
Alex got more guaranteed than Kap because Kap hasn't delivered yet on all that upside whereas Alex has delivered more that was expected of him and can be trusted to keep on doing the same.
mykc14 wrote:Futureite wrote:Lol!! Annnd, now that debate is settled.
I do remember a vehement argument we had regarding Kap's contract. I took the position that he gave the 49ers a great deal to allow them to retain talent, that he could have drug out the negotiations for bigger money or signed elsewhere for more in 2015.
A lot of people countered with "the 49ers don't trust him. See, our analysis of his play was correct".
Well there you have it. By any objective measure, a QB who is no better than Kaep with even less time invested by the organization just signed a deal for $28+ mil more gauranteed than Kap's deal.
Now comes all of the qualifications to show how the situations are different. Also known as "reaching".
All this proves is that KC felt that Smith was worth more than Kaep. Again, I don't believe for a second that the niners came to Kaep with a contract and he told them "no, i'll take less so we can be competitive" and I don't think you believe that either. What probably happened was that was the number they came to through negotiations, just like every other contract. He got what he could, they offered what he thought he was worth, nothing more, nothing less. When RW gets his contract he will get what the FO thinks he is worth, this isn't that hard to figure out.
Futureite wrote:c_hawkbob wrote:If you want to talk about trust, Alex is a more trustworthy QB than Kap.
He can be trusted not to make poor decisions, he can be trusted not to take unnecessary chances with his safety or that of his receivers, he can be trusted to run the exact offense his HC intends the way it's drawn up. He can be trusted put an acceptable corporate image in front of the press.
These are things valued by his current coach and organization.
His previous coach and organization chose to let him walk in favor of the almost ridiculous upside potential of a more spectacular athlete at the position. An organization less concerned with trustworthiness than what could be. An organization willing to take the greater chance of failure that came with the possibilities of greater success.
Alex got more guaranteed than Kap because Kap hasn't delivered yet on all that upside whereas Alex has delivered more that was expected of him and can be trusted to keep on doing the same.
Well those are all valid points Bob, but the only problem is the NFL doesn't pay 3-4 times the money for trustworthiness. Players are paid for talent and production, and by any objective measure the two are comparable in both. In fact, majority opinion has Kaep rated higher than Alex.
If there were some value attached to trustworthiness I guarantee it's not 3-4 times that of "upside". Considering the two guys have thrown nearly the exact same number of ints over the past 1.5 yrs, I am not sure how much merit that position holds in the first place.
Bottom line is the market just demonstrated what a 15ish (or less) rated QB garners in guranteed money. All agents will now use this as an arguing point for their player. Unless of course the player intentionally requests a different structure. Which is what Kaep said he would do before his negotiations and has maintained he did do after he signed the contract.
Futureite wrote:HumanCockroach wrote:You should read it again Future, as you missed the entire point..
'Nothing was proven by Smith's contract, except KC felt comfortable giving him it. I could also claim just as easily that KC obviously DID have faith in Smith, and SF DIDN'T in Kap, using the fact that KC felt he was WORTH the money, and SF DIDN'T feel Kap was. You're reading things into this stuff as proof positive, using nothing but desire, hopes and speculation as a basis for something you are claiming as "fact". It was a SMART move by the Niners, whether it be because of retaining talent, OR do to a lack of faith, either way, Kap bet on himself and SF was willing to let him, doesn't mean they would have paid him like Cutler or even Smith, it simply means the cost was acdeptable to them, and the risk was acceptable to Kap.'
I read it through the first time. Smith's contract means Kaep could have sought the same money, at minimum. Be it with the 49ers or another team. That is now an established fact.
Futureite wrote:
You all have done a complete 180 on this issue. Before the contract we were going to pay him at least $20 mil because Romo and Cutler got that, snd Kaep had all the leverage. Remember those comnents? After the contract was done your opinion shifted to "49ers don't trust him".
All this constant talk about integrity and not one person here can admit what they said before and after. And now I am listening to you guys talk up the value of a player in Alex Smith that I've literally read you dis since oh, 2011. I believe you all believed T'Jack was about the same grade st that time.
Kap is not worth what Alex is. No one would've paid him that. Right. What hypocritical homer bullshit this is. I should come to learn that 95% of you are never going to just admit you were wrong. It would kill you to admit Kaep is a team guy like good ol' Russ. Just ruins the good v evil theme.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests