Zorn76 wrote:Bottom line - we'll need our usual rushing attack to win, especially on the road.
We also gotta buck the trend of FG's and get more TD's. AZ and SF are not offensive juggernauts, but the Eagles lead the NFL in scoring with 375 pts (31ppg).
Cannot fall behind early and play shoot out with this kind of team. Get after Sanchez and force him into bad decisions. We're gonna load the box to contain McCoy anyway, so it's up to their passing O to win.
IMO, if we can win this game, we will secure our playoff position. Good momentum right now. Beat Philly to get to 9 W's, then follow it up with victories over SF and Stl. The road games here and in AZ are the X-factor. It can be done.
Go Seahawks!!!
Zorn76 wrote:Bottom line - we'll need our usual rushing attack to win, especially on the road.
We also gotta buck the trend of FG's and get more TD's. AZ and SF are not offensive juggernauts, but the Eagles lead the NFL in scoring with 375 pts (31ppg).
Cannot fall behind early and play shoot out with this kind of team. Get after Sanchez and force him into bad decisions. We're gonna load the box to contain McCoy anyway, so it's up to their passing O to win.
IMO, if we can win this game, we will secure our playoff position. Good momentum right now. Beat Philly to get to 9 W's, then follow it up with victories over SF and Stl. The road games here and in AZ are the X-factor. It can be done.
Go Seahawks!!!
monkey wrote:Meh, Philly's defense scares me not in the least, and our defense is BUILT to beat offenses like Chip Kelly's.
This is EXACTLY the type of team we are built to beat. San Fran worried me more TBH.
Philly has a good pass rush, top 5 if I am not mistaken. Not that I'm all that concerned as Russell's hot right now and can deal with a good pass rush. He won't fold his tent like Romo did yesterday. But it is something we're going to have to plan against
NorthHawk wrote:"Our red zone offense really sucks. I don't understand why Pete didn't challenge Moeaki's near touchdown catch and run. It sure looked to me like he broke the plane. Somehow I knew we'd end up settling for a FG."
It looked like it could have been a TD, but I'm not sure the views were enough to overturn the call.
I really can't figure out why the NFL with all the money riding on wins, wouldn't have a series of goal line cameras at each end of the field as well as cameras down the sidelines. With today's technology it wouldn't be too expensive and they don't have to be very large - consider the pictures on smartphones and security cameras and how clear they are.
4XPIPS wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't we burn a timeout right after that play because the length of the play.... and getting all the players down field to line up? So if we burned a Time out, why not just challenge it anyways and if we lose.. oh well we lost the "same" time out we used to save the play clock?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests