c_hawkbob wrote:I think they should force Brady to watch Giselle have a night of unbridled, passionate sex with a Seahawks fan, and I'd like to volunteer for the duty.
Hawktawk wrote:Wells report is out. Too stupid to properly link it but the findings are eyebrow raisers. What should be the punishment?
c_hawkbob wrote:I think they should force Brady to watch Giselle have a night of unbridled, passionate sex with a Seahawks fan, and I'd like to volunteer for the duty.
c_hawkbob wrote:Eisen this afternoon quoted one of the Patriots legal types as insisting that NFL bylaws demanded nothing more that a fine for deflategate and that trying to hit Brady with anything more than a $75000 fine was "a fight the NFL didn't want" ...
NorthHawk wrote:It actually could have a great effect on games.
If Brady otherwise had thrown incompletions or interceptions instead of positive plays, games that look like blowouts could have been much closer or have a different outcome.
Add into that the curious fumble statistics of running backs who lose the ball at a much higher rate after moving to other teams and deflated balls look like they may have major impacts on performance.
savvyman wrote:I may be in the minority here - But I do not want to see Tom Brady get suspended.
I do not wish to have the impact of deflategate affect the 16 game season in the NFL.
Was there ever a doubt in anyone's mind during this entire affair that not only was Brady aware of the ball inflation practices but he most certainly was the final tester and approver of the proper inflation rate for each ball?
It is also beyond any reasonable doubt that Parcells and the entire organization were also unaware of the ball inflation policies and practices of the Patriot team?
However, I do not wish to see the punishment levied for deflategate effect any of the play that happens on the field next season.
What I would like to see is that the Patriots are stripped of draft picks in Rounds 1, 2 & 3 in next years college draft. This would be a severe punishment, send the right message to all teams and their players without affecting the outcome of the games next season - Like a suspension of Tom Brady for up to a year would as what some news stories are reporting is possible.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/myers-roger-goodell-suspend-tom-brady-deflategate-article-1.2215881
Seahawks4Ever wrote:First of all any punishment Goody Two Shoes hands down will be lessened on appeal.
Secondly we all know Brady lied, BUT when Kraft and Belicose asked Brady whether he did it or not I am sure he told them the truth. That means that both Kraft and Belicheat have been 100% behind the cover up and have been lying to the NFL investigators.
I mean, Kraft and Belicheat have really shown nothing but contempt for Goody and his office.
I order to show that he has any authority left Goodell HAS TO COME DOWN HARD on both Kraft and Belicheat.
We are talking about the integrity of the game here. Belicheat is a repeat offender and should be banned for life, and I don't mean like Greg Williams either who was forgiven after one year. I mean for LIFE.
Kraft should be banned from having anything to do with his franchise for 5 years like MLB's George Steinbrenner was.
Now, I would also take away the Patriots entire draft for two seasons.
As for Brady, he too should be banned for life for tampering with the integrity of the game.
None of this will happen, not even close, but if I was Goodell I don't see how I am not emasculated if I did anything less.
NorthHawk wrote:The difference between on field cheating and equipment modification or other to get an advantage is huge.
On field infractions can be seen by all and corrected by the officials. If officials aren't calling something, both teams have the opportunity to break the rules.
In every sport I played, we played to the Officials - what do they like calling, and what do they let us get away with.
Off field infractions give the impression that a team is simply better coached or has more talent when in fact it isn't or doesn't.
The hidden deception hits at the heart of competition as much as PEDs do and should rightfully have a different and more substantial punishment.
NorthHawk wrote:The difference between on field cheating and equipment modification or other to get an advantage is huge.
On field infractions can be seen by all and corrected by the officials. If officials aren't calling something, both teams have the opportunity to break the rules.
In every sport I played, we played to the Officials - what do they like calling, and what do they let us get away with.
Off field infractions give the impression that a team is simply better coached or has more talent when in fact it isn't or doesn't.
The hidden deception hits at the heart of competition as much as PEDs do and should rightfully have a different and more substantial punishment.
HumanCockroach wrote:Per Rodger Goodell, "ignorance is NOT an excuse" meaning not only Brady, AND Bill, but Kraft and FO personnel are fair game, at least if he is looking to be consistent. He can ask Payton and Loomis and Co for a refresher if he needs to.
Old but Slow wrote:How about the head coach? He knew nothing? Is he not responsible for the conduct of his team? It is somewhat like the punishment when a large corporation is found to be committing fraud. Put the CEO in jail. If you don't, the misconduct will continue. Sorry to inject a non-football analogy, but the comparison is fair. Pro football is big business, and it includes amazing amounts of money. If you don't make the decision makers responsible, there will be no improvement.
HumanCockroach wrote:Interesting RD, I suppose ultimately there was never enough evidence that I saw that made me believe anyone on the Saints ever willingly cheated, here that isn' t the case. Maybe I'm just caught up on the " smoking gun" aspect of it...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests