Hawktawk wrote:I'm OK with the outcome especially how it went down. AZ struggled mightily to put away a team at home which Seattle had crushed on the road the week before. In the process they paved the way for the 5 seed for Seattle so it was a no lose situation for me as a fan.If Seattle wanted the division they needed to flip the switch a few weeks earlier than they did.
Could AZ drop 3 in a row? Not likely but not unheard of. If they drop 2 I assure you they are dropping 3 unless Seattle inexplicably takes another dump as a huge favorite over the next 3 games. 10-5 Hawks vs. 11-4 AZ with it all on the line would be magnificent.
More likely Seattle is a #5 WC facing the least horrible team from the NFC East. That looks like a pretty good path to the semifinals.
...their is no way, barring injury, that we go into their house and beat them.
Sorry, I really hope I am wrong.
burrrton wrote:Eh, this puts us into the 5-seed. It was going to be a benefit to us no matter who won, and considering how much of a long shot the division was anyway, this might have been the more desirable outcome.
Let ARI and GB keep winning- assuming we follow suit, that keeps us on a collision course with the NFC East champ.
obiken wrote:True but with no home game I don't see us making it back to the SB. The likely matchup now is the Panthers vs. the Cards for the NFC title.
If the Vikes could have won this game we might have a had a chance.
obiken wrote:[
Its not to be all on the line. They will have 12 wins period. Moreover, their is no way, barring injury, that we go into their house and beat them. Remember, this was a on 4 days rest and the Vikes played beyond themselves. They are just a better FB team right now than we are. Too many weapons, too many playmakers, better coach. Sorry, I really hope I am wrong.
burrrton wrote:Eh, this puts us into the 5-seed. It was going to be a benefit to us no matter who won, and considering how much of a long shot the division was anyway, this might have been the more desirable outcome.
Let ARI and GB keep winning- assuming we follow suit, that keeps us on a collision course with the NFC East champ.
obiken wrote:
All right HT! show me the way to the Kool-Aid baby!! I'm in!
Hawktawk wrote:Yeah Zorn. Not only did Minn hang with them they did so coming off a beating by a very physical Hawks team 5 days earlier. Meanwhile AZ had a snoozer vs the Rams.
That AZ team looked beatable even in winning. Did AZ peak too soon?
Hawktawk wrote:Yeah Zorn. Not only did Minn hang with them they did so coming off a beating by a very physical Hawks team 5 days earlier. Meanwhile AZ had a snoozer vs the Rams.
That AZ team looked beatable even in winning. Did AZ peak too soon?
That AZ team looked beatable even in winning. Did AZ peak too soon?
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Several teams were able to take advantage of our team early in the season, but we are NOT the same team that lost 4th. Qtr. leads to St. Louis, Green Bay, Cincinnati, and Carolina, all of whom were undefeated at the time (the Rams game being the first we were both undefeated of course) not to mention the home game against Arizona which I believe was our low point.
But then....
RiverDog wrote:...River Dog got pizzed of and took down his #12 flag in protest of a team who's personality had changed and got on his hot line to Pete Carroll and told him to quit frigging around and start scoring more points than his opponent. THAT was the turning point in the season.
Zorn76 wrote:With TB's loss to the Saints, things get a bit more secure in terms of making playoffs. Nice to own tiebreaker over Minny, and the rest of the field in 2 games or more back with 3 to play. What a difference a month makes:)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests