Chi-Sea game thread

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby jshawaii22 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:05 pm

Anthony Wrote:
You mean last year before our new oc and PC said stay in the pocket longer


Well, if that's true, they have a NEW OC, so it's time to sit Russell down and tell him that planned roll-outs are OK again. The OLIne will not allow him to sit in the pocket, even if he is holding on to the ball too long.
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 2001
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:09 pm

Griffin is a beast
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:14 pm

jshawaii22 wrote:
Well, if that's true, they have a NEW OC, so it's time to sit Russell down and tell him that planned roll-outs are OK again. The OLIne will not allow him to sit in the pocket, even if he is holding on to the ball too long.


Problem is it is the new of that wants him to stay in the pocket longer. Last year RW lead us in rushing accounted for over 80% of our offensive yards and over 95% offensive Yes. PC did not like that so they decided to make him stay in the pocket, and run a bad system. With a bunch of tier 3 wrs
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby curmudgeon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:16 pm

Are these the 85 Bears? Are they?......
User avatar
curmudgeon
Legacy
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:15 pm
Location: Kennewick, Washington 99337

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:18 pm

They run a WR screen and get 7 we get 2
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby I-5 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:23 pm

Who is in favor of sticking with the OC?
User avatar
I-5
Legacy
 
Posts: 1770
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:25 pm

I-5 wrote:Who is in favor of sticking with the OC?


Who really thinks PC will make a change. I can guarantee this will all be laid at the feet our QB while PC continues to over compensate for Sherman's b.s. Meanwhile if we are not going to give Wilson the weapons and systems we should trade him.
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby The POPE » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:26 pm

curmudgeon wrote:Are these the 85 Bears? Are they?......

Nope, we are seeing a 90’s version of the Hawks
User avatar
The POPE
Legacy
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:46 pm

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby curmudgeon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:27 pm

Turn out the lights, the party’s over....
User avatar
curmudgeon
Legacy
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:15 pm
Location: Kennewick, Washington 99337

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby mykc14 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:30 pm

Peteball at its finest... before that last TD I bet PC would have felt good about where the Hawks were because they were within 1 score.
mykc14
Legacy
 
Posts: 2759
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:45 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:40 pm

Only took 3 qtr for them to run up tempo like 2015 hmm wonder why they waited so long too run what works.
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:42 pm

mykc14 wrote:Peteball at its finest... before that last TD I bet PC would have felt good about where the Hawks were because they were within 1 score.


And there is lies one of the biggest problems, this is what PC wants, he has been lucky he has had a great defense and great QB who can make things out of nothing. Now we only have the QB, even ELITE QB needs help
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:54 pm

Well thats it, not sure about the throw, or why the wr did not come back for the ball
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:55 pm

Anthony wrote:Well thats it, not sure about the throw, or why the rb did not come back for the ball
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby jshawaii22 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:55 pm

That was a flashback moment... 20 years or so ago in GB.
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 2001
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby curmudgeon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:56 pm

It was thrown to Penny...
User avatar
curmudgeon
Legacy
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:15 pm
Location: Kennewick, Washington 99337

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby The POPE » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:59 pm

Anthony wrote:Well thats it, not sure about the throw, or why the wr did not come back for the ball

Russell choked... fat lady sings
User avatar
The POPE
Legacy
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:46 pm

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:01 pm

That's it, to much to over come, not enough help, and we waited to long to get going
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby curmudgeon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:01 pm

On another note, on pace for 96 sacks.....
User avatar
curmudgeon
Legacy
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:15 pm
Location: Kennewick, Washington 99337

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:05 pm

The POPE wrote:Russell choked... fat lady sings

I would not say chocked, just had to much to do, and little help, why didn't the rb come back to the ball, that's his job. Throw could have been better also. But choke, nah, besides as Michael Jordan once said "for every game winning shot I made, I missed 2".
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:06 pm

curmudgeon wrote:On another note, on pace for 96 sacks.....



Wow that's a lot, at least we will lead the league in something lol
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:08 pm

Wilson never gives up
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:11 pm

Up tempo, That's the ticket
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby HumanCockroach » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:37 pm

Smh...
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby obiken » Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:29 am

I would not say chocked, just had to much to do, and little help, why didn't the rb come back to the ball, that's his job. Throw could have been better also. But choke, nah, besides as Michael Jordan once said "for every game winning shot I made, I missed 2".


Thats it, he's rookie, that says it all. You have Vets that still dont come back for the ball very well.
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby Anthony » Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:41 am

The POPE wrote:According to Pete and John the Hawks are gonna run the ball. What they failed to mention was that would be 5x a game.
lol agreed problem us they are running the wrong system for the players they have.
User avatar
Anthony
Legacy
 
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:50 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby idhawkman » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:01 am

This loss was all on the offense. 3 Quarters and all you have is a total of 80 yards? How long do you expect the defense to keep you in the game?

I don't want to hear how elite any of the offensive players are. They all are to blame - all of them. No one excluded.
User avatar
idhawkman
Legacy
 
Posts: 3012
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:00 am

Re: Chi-Sea game thread

Postby NorthHawk » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:29 am

On another thread I mentioned that there are only about 5 Offensive Draft picks that are on this team in Pete's tenure (9 Drafts).
A bunch more are succeeding on other teams, but our failure on Offense is identifying who can play here under this philosophy.
It seems there aren't many to choose from, so we cycle through them on a regular basis.
I think the problem is todays Offensive game in the NFL has passed Pete by.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11455
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Previous

Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests

cron