HumanCockroach wrote:Wait... I thought it was the amazing Penny that was the beast.... lmfao
idhawkman wrote:Gurley wasn't that good the first year or so he was with the Rams and he was a starter there. I know he also got hurt but it might take a few games for Penny to learn how to use the blockers. I think Penny is a more patient runner whereas Carson and Davis are more aggressive at the LOS.
HumanCockroach wrote:Procise already no longer needed, he was insurance until McKissic was back, but with Penny growing ability in passing game, and JDs health returning, holding on to Procise is a luxury, not a necessity.
Perhaps they can trade him for a late round pick, if not, likely he is cut within the next 2 to 3 weeks, barring injury.
I do question the pass protection ability of Penny, as seattle clearly still prefers Davis in that role, tipping your hat can be a mistake, and nobody buys Davis split out wide when they ho to an empty backfield.... Penny creates doubt in that circumstance, Davis doesn't.
HumanCockroach wrote:Maybe, maybe not, I know speed isn't the most important facet of a RBs game... you only have to look to Michael for an example, or procise, or numerous other Seattle backs. He may get there, Carson already is...
I think Penny has more speed than either Carson or Davis but he needs to work on things like timing and patience (when to wait, when to accelerate) and picking the best hole. I imagine as he gets more carries he will get better at those things. It's the speed of the pro game that is the hardest thing to adjust to for these youngsters.
trents
idhawkman wrote:Here's what is most important about all three being effective. Teams can't game plan for just one back. They have to take time out of practice and planning to account for all three. That makes them less effective on all three.
I just wish that RW would keep it once in the first few plays to set the tone that thye have to account for him, too. That opens up the cutback lanes for the RBs becasue the DE can't just crash down behind the back but has to play it straight up until they know that RW doesn't have it.
NorthHawk wrote:
True, but there has to be one main RB that the team can depend on and who can get into a groove after 10 to 15 carries.
That shouldn't be too hard with our emphasis on the run game, but if we get behind early, there might be more pressure to pass to catch up.
HumanCockroach wrote:Anyone ever seen a running back get flipped like that before and land it, and continue to attempt to run? I've seen straight over flips occasionally, but that was more likely to be seen on a pommel horse than a football field. Guys a special athlete, with incredible balance and strength....
We all pined for a Lynch replacement, he's here, enjoy it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests