I-5 wrote:I believe there would be no SB trophy without his leadership as the owner of the Seahawks. RIP and thank you Paul Allen.
idhawkman wrote:s***!!! Shocked me when I got the notification on my phone. RIP PA.
idhawkman wrote:Good post River and thank you for reminding us not to judge other people's life by our standards.
I saw where PA was said to be worth $20.2B. I'm not sure if he was 50/50 partners with Bill Gates or not but if so, I think Gates had like $65B back in the 90s when I worked in Washington DC. Gates was the richest man in America. This would indicate to me that PA "GAVE AWAY" more money (like double) what he had. That is something to admire and I'm sure he has touched more lives with those resources than most of us will ever know.
RIP PA.
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the kudos, Idahawk. Passing judgment on personal characteristics is one of those biases that has to be actively resisted and reshaped, at least for a crusty old man like me.
My understanding is that Allen left Microsoft quite early, prior to his purchase of the Seahawks. He still owned stock but was no longer part of the management team and had gone his seperate way with his new company, Vulcan Enterprises (in honor of his Star Trek fascanation as a child). He was not on board with the company for much of their profitable years in the tech heavy '90's.
When he bought the Seahawks, Allen had more net worth than all of the other 29 majority owners put together. Like Gates, he gave away much of his fortune to charity or financed stuff like the recovery of several WW2 era warships, including the USS Indianapolis (discussed during the movie "Jaws), the aircraft USS Lexington, and the USS Jueneau. He's also given millions to humanitarian efforts, like fighting ebola in Africa. It is fair to say of both him and Gates that they would rank much higher on the list of the richest people in the world if he wasn't such a philanthropist. Many of the Seahawk players, current and former, even guys like Michael Bennett, have eluded to Allen's generosity. Despite his reclusiveness, he truly was a very sensitive and caring man.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests