RiverDog wrote:But I am not thrilled with their decision to remodel Key Arena rather than team up with Chris Hansen's proposed venue in Sodo. The traffic getting in and out of there is going to be an absolute nightmare, and there's no dedicated roadway transit within a mile of the place as an alternate.
obiken wrote:The City of Seattle was never going to NOT use Key Arena, it would have been a white elephant otherwise. I am pissed River because I wanted Hockey in PDX. They only reason was Paul Allen, he did not want them competing with the Blazers.
burrrton wrote:Couldn't agree more. Even if they're able to remodel that dump back to respectability, it's still smack dab in the middle of Seattle Center with all the logistical nightmares that come with it.
Contrast that with CenturyLink and Safeco locations (which would have also essentially been the SoDo location).
Monumentally stupid decision, all too typical of Seattle leadership, that I hope doesn't hurt the new franchise too badly.
If they name them the "Totems" I'm down
You're exactly right about those baboons on the Seattle city council.
jshawaii22 wrote:If they name them the "Totems" I'm down... I used to go to a lot of their games as a kid. Had a baby sitter who was the aunt for one of the players in the early 60's -- (excuse my spelling) Guyle Fielder... I used to sit right behind the bench and had all kinds of broken and used 'stuff' -- made for great 'show and tell' at school.
Good Luck Seattle -- Maybe the NBA is next -
Aseahawkfan wrote:Wish it was a basketball team. Just not a big fan of hockey. Maybe I'll watch to support Seattle sports. I don't know. If this is just another Mariners suck for years situation, then it will suck.
RiverDog wrote:Part of the problem is that I played football, basketball, and baseball, but I've ice skated just once, let alone play hockey, so I can't identify with it like I can the other 3 major sports. Hockey is noting but a bunch of chaotic movements as far as I am concerned.
Oly wrote:As for the name, I'd be down with the Totems or Sockeyes. For either, I'd like to see them consult with local tribes to find a way to make the logo and aesthetic reflect the Native presence in a way that is respectful. That is one of the things I liked about the Hawks logo even as a kid; that art just feels like Seattle to me and it respects the heritage of the place.
RiverDog wrote:I wouldn't advance a logo that tribes objected to
RiverDog wrote:My understanding is that's how we ended up with the stoned seagull, which IMO was the 2nd lamest NFL logo ever, topped only by Tampa Bay's winking pirate.
I'd like to see a nickname like the Lumberjacks, something that's unique in the professional sporting world, inspires a tough, rugged attitude, and reflective of an industry that helped make our region into what it is today.
EmeraldBullet wrote:Im excited for Seattle getting a team. Now I will have to choose and allegiance though. Grew up in Bellingham rooting for the canucks. Now I live closer to Seattle, but should I really switch teams? I might wait to see the uniforms and team name before I make a decision.
NorthHawk wrote:I just hope the new Hockey team doesn't have that radioactive puke green that the other teams seem to want to foist upon the world.
I'm talking about the Sounders and the alternative Seahawks jerseys. The Seahawks one is an embarrassment.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests