RiverDog wrote:Yesterday's game was a fiasco, with 14 of them being called on us for a mind boggling 148 yards. The two teams combined had 22 accepted penalties for 214 yards. To put it in perspective, penalty yardage was equivalent to 29% of the total offense of both teams combined.
I've heard people complain about penalties more so this season than in years past, and it's caused me to wonder: Are there more penalties being called this season? What about a decade ago? 25 years ago?
Here's a good, sortable site that tracks penalties. You'll note that we currently rank 3rd in the league, which is about par for a Pete Carroll-coached team:
http://www.nflpenalties.com/
If I get bored, I might go back and do some homework and see if our impressions have any validity or not.
As a side note, Walter Jones got called for just 8 holding penalties in his entire career. He had more Pro Bowl appearances than holding penalties.
Anthony wrote:Great post, what makes these penalties worse is a lot were on the oline and it cost us the game.
RiverDog wrote:
Although I agree with you in that penalties were the leading cause of our loss yesterday, the fact that most occurred on the OL should not be surprising.
The OL is always going to have more penalties called on them than other position groupings. First of all, there are more offensive linemen (5) than any other position group. Secondly, unlike a wide receiver that may go an entire series without making any physical contact with the opposition, an offensive lineman makes contact on almost every play. More contact puts them at a higher risk of getting called for holding, hands to the face, and so on.
Take a look at the link I posted. Defensive back is the only position grouping that's even close to the OL in terms of number of flags drawn.
Anthony wrote:I agree with you my point was and is this has been an ongoing thing with our olines for years, and other lines don't get near as many calls on them as ours. Also has was shown during the game a lot of them are not needed.
RiverDog wrote:
That's true, and was one of the biggest raps on Tom Cable.
But our penalty problem goes deeper than just the offensive line. Yesterday, for example, our defense had more penalties called on them (7) than did our offense (5), and in years past, Michael Bennett has been a flag magnet.
Yesterday, half of our penalties came in the 4th quarter and overtime. It truly was the biggest factor in the outcome of the game.
Hawktawk wrote:Seattle had a large number of what could be called” ticky tack” fouls . The 9’ers didn’t . It’s bullshit . Let’s play football . The officials are wrecking the game .
RiverDog wrote:I guess my biggest problem in general with the penalties is that they were calling them close in the 4th quarter when the game was on the line. If they want to establish their authority and keep the game under control, then fine, but do it in the first half. 7 penalties on one team in the 4th quarter/OT is outrageous.
idhawkman wrote:I won't go as far as to say they are gambling but I used to be able to tell you who would win an NBA game with 10 min left in the game. Refs would only call fouls on one side.
In the NFL, it cost us a SuperBowl when they called fouls they didn't actually see but deducted what happened. The NFL players are getting better and better at acting and I think the refs should go back to only calling fouls that they ACTUALLY SEE. Also, fouls away from the play should be watched but not called every time. E.g. a running play to the left should not have the DB on the other side being called for illegal contact or holding on the other side of the play and away from the play. just my .02 worth.
Hawktawk wrote:
Agreed. That goes for fouls that might occur when the play is long gone. Ive seen ticky tack calls 25 yards or more away from the play. The SF game reminded me of XL in the 4th quarter there were so many questionable calls all on huge plays on both sides of the ball on Seattle and virtually none on a 3-11 team in that time frame. Of course XL will always be the gold standard which has shaped my paranoid mindset regarding officiating ever since .
Hawktawk wrote:Agreed. That goes for fouls that might occur when the play is long gone. Ive seen ticky tack calls 25 yards or more away from the play. The SF game reminded me of XL in the 4th quarter there were so many questionable calls all on huge plays on both sides of the ball on Seattle and virtually none on a 3-11 team in that time frame. Of course XL will always be the gold standard which has shaped my paranoid mindset regarding officiating ever since .
idhawkman wrote:One thing I keep in the back of my mind is that this whole industry is built on "entertainment". No NFL game is entertaining and people will tune out if the score is lopsided or the dominant team is real far ahead. To keep games in check I sometimes see the refs "insert" themselves to keep the game close. (Critical third down play, etc). If ever confirmed the suspicions that many of us have the NFL will see a collapse bigger than what the WWE went through.
idhawkman wrote:Also, fouls away from the play should be watched but not called every time. E.g. a running play to the left should not have the DB on the other side being called for illegal contact or holding on the other side of the play and away from the play. just my .02 worth.
Rambo2014 wrote:if you can't do the time!
Don't do the crime!
Solid advice
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests