NorthHawk wrote:Vance Joseph in Denver is gone as well as Steve Wilks in Arizona according to PFT.
RiverDog wrote:
Joseph got just two years but they were the first back-to-back losing seasons in...how long? Big expectations. And Wilks had just one season.
I'm wondering about Doug Marrone. He clearly lost that Jacksonville team. But the team owner said he's keeping him.
politicalfootball wrote:This is an old thread. Full of opinion. Breaking news is from the morning that it happened.
RiverDog wrote:
Joseph got just two years but they were the first back-to-back losing seasons in...how long? Big expectations. And Wilks had just one season.
I'm wondering about Doug Marrone. He clearly lost that Jacksonville team. But the team owner said he's keeping him.
idhawkman wrote:Wilkes surprises me especially after the injuries he had to go through with the team and the changeover that was in the works. I think they commented yesterday on how the OC was still calling Arian's complicated offense and not his own.
idhawkman wrote:I think Marrone is benefiting on Coughlin's influence. Tom Coughlin has proven to be a winner and if he thinks that Marrone has what it takes then they chalk this year up to cleaning house and come out stronger next year. Its not like Coughlin hadn't done it before when he first went to NY.
Agent 86 wrote:Marvin Lewis has been let go as well. Here is the updated list from in season to today:
Jackson(Browns)
McCarthy(Packers)
Koetter(Bucs)
Bowles(Jets)
Joseph(Broncos)
Wilks(Cardinals)
Gase(Dolphins)
Lewis(Bengals)
As well, it sounds like Mike Mayock will be hired as the Raiders new GM for the fired Reggie McKenzie.
obiken wrote:I think Wilks was a good coach, the Cards never quit yesterday. I think its a mistake.
obiken wrote:I think Wilks was a good coach, the Cards never quit yesterday. I think its a mistake.
Uppercut wrote:Wonder if the tire kickers will be looking at Shotty and Norton
RiverDog wrote:Good point. I had forgotten about Coughlin. The man has received a number of reprieves during his own coaching career. Perhaps that accounts for the tolerance. But the team has definetly under performed and isn't playing for him, reminded me of the 2009 Hawks.
Hawktawk wrote:Shotties really rehabilitated his resume. I hope he sticks around. He would possibly be the guy who replaces Pete in a few years.
As for Pete's proteges Quinn has done a pretty good job and would have a lombardi if wonderboy Shanahan had not forgot to run the ball with a 25 point lead. Richard has been mentioned as a dark horse HC candidate already. Not the Walsh tree but even a great coach like Billacheat hasn't exactly lit the world on fire with his subordinates. McDaniels might get another look this year.
trents wrote:Pete's success hinges on his personality as a motivator. Something you can't really coach. You either got it or you don't.
RiverDog wrote:Pete's success hinges on his personality as a motivator. Something you can't really coach. You either got it or you don't
There's more to it than that. For one, Pete has an eye for defensive talent. He knows the types of players that will succeed in his system. But like you said about being a motivator, that's something that can be pretty difficult to teach.
Hawktawk wrote:...I think he’s (Pete Carroll) got a HOF type resume already.
RiverDog wrote:Not quite. He's going to need at least one more Lombardi. Heck, even Tom Coughlin has two, and no one's talking HOF for him. Keep in mind that prior to the Hawks job, Pete's NFL resume was pretty thin.
But I'll say this: Regardless of how we do in the playoffs, this year is Pete's finest single year of coaching.
Aseahawkfan wrote:No way. Super Bowl 2013 is his finest year of coaching. We smoked one of the highest rated offenses in history. Not just beat them, but blew them out of the water no contest. Almost had a shut out against Peyton Manning in his best statistical year for TDs. Our defense was legendary that year.
RiverDog wrote:2013 was the culmination of 4 years of rebuilding. The roster was loaded, with at least 3 potential HOF'ers on defense, and that's not counting guys like Chancellor, Bennett, and Avril, all Pro Bowl quality. Plus we had Beast busting up defenses and Russell's run/pass threat to defend. Line up the 2013 offense against the 2018 squad, and I'm willing to bet that there wouldn't be more than two or three starters from 2018 that could break into the starting lineup on the 2013 squad (less Russell, Wags, Baldwin, and KJ of course).
This season, Pete not only was less 5 HOF/Pro Bowl players on defense alone, he was minus his entire coaching staff. He took what was an under performing OL and turned them into one of the best OL's in the league. IMO we have a clear shot at the SB, and that's coming from the eternal pessimist in the forum.
Actually it's an apples vs. oranges comparison. 2013 was the best team he's produced, having taken 4 years to get there, but 2018 is the best single season job of coaching he's done.
Aseahawkfan wrote:So we'll have to agree to disagree.
Hawktawk wrote:Shotties really rehabilitated his resume. I hope he sticks around. He would possibly be the guy who replaces Pete in a few years.
As for Pete's proteges Quinn has done a pretty good job and would have a lombardi if wonderboy Shanahan had not forgot to run the ball with a 25 point lead. Richard has been mentioned as a dark horse HC candidate already. Not the Walsh tree but even a great coach like Billacheat hasn't exactly lit the world on fire with his subordinates. McDaniels might get another look this year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests