Aseahawkfan wrote:Lamar taking the lead in the MVP race. Russell has fallen off lately. Hopefully he can get his name back in the discussion the last three games. He has every chance. Two bad teams and one win and you win the division and get the 1st or 2nd seed or lose and lose the division and end up the 5th seed. It's huge games like that where you separate yourself.
NorthHawk wrote:Didn't Archie Manning win it one year while on a terrible Saints team?
Or am I "remembering" something that didn't happen?
RiverDog wrote:NorthHawk" Didn't Archie Manning win it one year while on a terrible Saints team?
Or am I "remembering" something that didn't happen?
Archie Manning? You're letting your age show.
According to Wiki, Manning was never the league MVP, but he did get voted Player of the Year by the UPI in 1978. The Saints went 7-9 that season, so they weren't all that terrible.
NorthHawk wrote:Player of the year it was. My mistake.
His team was only 7-9 because he was so good. His surrounding cast was not good at all even if there were a couple of
other diamonds on that team.
RiverDog wrote:By definition, the player that is awarded the MVP needs to come from a team that's having a great season. It's pretty hard to argue that a team like the Bengals would be any better off without Andy Dalton than they would with him. That's why Dak Prescott and Christian McCaffery have dropped out of the discussion even though their stats would normally support an MVP candidacy.
The Jets are a garbage team and the Ravens were playing at home, so you would expect Jackson to play well. But he's been doing it all season, is the 5th leading rusher in the league, already over 1,000 yards and has been playing well down the stretch as he's thrown just one INT in his last 9 games and a QB rating of 100+ in 7 of his last 8 games while his team has won 10 straight and are on the cusp of HFA.
That's no disrespect to Russell as even though he's going through a bit of a mini slump, if you can call it that, he's had an MVP-like performance and we've had an unexpectedly good season.
Aseahawkfan wrote:They going to catch up with Lamar like they always do, but he's having a hell of a season. He keeps running like that and he's going to take a beating.
Hawktawk wrote:Russ is the most careful runner of the bunch , always was. He’s really playing a similar game to what he’s always played, just better than ever until the last few weeks. Vick was reckless as was RG 3 whose career was derailed by Mike Shanahan playing him vs Seattle in the WC with an existing injury . He was never the same .
Luck also fit in that category of going in standing up and taking huge shots.
Jackson is a bit different . He’s put together very well, broad shoulders, thick neck, seems very durable . What’s really different from all but Vick is his speed which coupled with his moves and ability to break tackles is unlike any QB I’ve ever seen. As for his passing it doesn’t need much development with multiple 5 td games , one of 3 men in history to record a perfect passer rating in 3 contests . He leads the league in QBR and TD passes. And he’s already developing the ability to use his legs to buy time and pull defenders towards him before flipping it over their heads over and over .
The guy is a unique player, I’ll be a big fan unless it’s against the hawks and I’ll make a prediction he can go along quite a while like this in this excellent offense of Greg Roman , the Lebron of the NFL.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not sure how much running style has to do with being injury prone. Body style might make more of a difference. I'm only guessing, but it would seem to make sense that Russell, being small in stature and without the long legs that puts stress on knee joints, tendons, etc, might be less subject to injury than a player that's 4 or 5 inches taller and 50 pounds heavier.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not sure how much running style has to do with being injury prone. Body style might make more of a difference. I'm only guessing, but it would seem to make sense that Russell, being small in stature and without the long legs that puts stress on knee joints, tendons, etc, might be less subject to injury than a player that's 4 or 5 inches taller and 50 pounds heavier.
c_hawkbob wrote:I'd say running style is at least as important a part of the equation as physical makeup. I think RG III's running style had more to do with his rapid demise than his slight build. Both were definite factors, but he just didn't have a clue how to protect himself ...
Uppercut wrote:How many years does Wilson have left in him?
31 now and wants to play till 45, no way
He may have 4-5 more productive years howvere
Hawktawk wrote:Russ is the most careful runner of the bunch , always was. He’s really playing a similar game to what he’s always played, just better than ever until the last few weeks. Vick was reckless as was RG 3 whose career was derailed by Mike Shanahan playing him vs Seattle in the WC with an existing injury . He was never the same .
Luck also fit in that category of going in standing up and taking huge shots.
Jackson is a bit different . He’s put together very well, broad shoulders, thick neck, seems very durable . What’s really different from all but Vick is his speed which coupled with his moves and ability to break tackles is unlike any QB I’ve ever seen. As for his passing it doesn’t need much development with multiple 5 td games , one of 3 men in history to record a perfect passer rating in 3 contests . He leads the league in QBR and TD passes. And he’s already developing the ability to use his legs to buy time and pull defenders towards him before flipping it over their heads over and over .
The guy is a unique player, I’ll be a big fan unless it’s against the hawks and I’ll make a prediction he can go along quite a while like this in this excellent offense of Greg Roman , the Lebron of the NFL.
c_hawkbob wrote:Oh I think he's (Russell) got at least 10 more ... there's nobody in the NFL I can think of that has more of both the physical and mental makeup to remain healthy.
c_hawkbob wrote:Oh I think he's (Russell) got at least 10 more ... there's nobody in the NFL I can think of that has more of both the physical and mental makeup to remain healthy.
RiverDog wrote:But it won't be due to his running ability. Russell has matured into a very good QB playing from/managing the pocket. He now runs only when the opportunity presents itself or when a play breaks down. He's a different QB than when he first entered the league. If Lamar Jackson hopes to have a 10+ career, he's going to have to do the same thing.
Oh I think he's (Russell) got at least 10 more ... there's nobody in the NFL I can think of that has more of both the physical and mental makeup to remain healthy. But it won't be due to his running ability. Russell has matured into a very good QB playing from/managing the pocket. He now runs only when the opportunity presents itself or when a play breaks down. He's a different QB than when he first entered the league. If Lamar Jackson hopes to have a 10+ career, he's going to have to do the same thing.
Agreed. In fact it looks better as a single paragraph (we'll call it a Riverbob quote):
Riverbob wrote:Oh I think he's (Russell) got at least 10 more ... there's nobody in the NFL I can think of that has more of both the physical and mental makeup to remain healthy. But it won't be due to his running ability. Russell has matured into a very good QB playing from/managing the pocket. He now runs only when the opportunity presents itself or when a play breaks down. He's a different QB than when he first entered the league. If Lamar Jackson hopes to have a 10+ career, he's going to have to do the same thing.
Agreed. In fact it looks better as a single paragraph (we'll call it a Riverbob quote):
Riverbob wrote:Oh I think he's (Russell) got at least 10 more ... there's nobody in the NFL I can think of that has more of both the physical and mental makeup to remain healthy. But it won't be due to his running ability. Russell has matured into a very good QB playing from/managing the pocket. He now runs only when the opportunity presents itself or when a play breaks down. He's a different QB than when he first entered the league. If Lamar Jackson hopes to have a 10+ career, he's going to have to do the same thing.
RiverDog wrote:There. How's that look?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests