MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Because they are cut out of the same bolt of cloth perhaps? Or maybe just very similar cloths. It seems politician on both sides of the aisle are capable anything. It doesn't so much surprise me that he did this; it surprises me he would do it after what you just mentioned. Trump got hammered for holding classified documents and should have.
If they can get him on it, then they will. If they can't, then they won't. I don't know that it will really come to much especially if Trump's didn't. That would be highly hypocritical if Biden got clapped up for it. Rest assured; they'll parlay it into whatever political gain they can.
RiverDog wrote:10-4 on that. This is like manna from heaven for the Republicans as Biden has shot himself in the foot. This is a legitimate issue with serious questions that need to be answered. The fortunate thing for Biden is that this isn't an election year.
I'm wondering how widespread this classified document issue is. Why are they allowed to leave government property in the first place? Did Obama keep classified documents in his personal offices? Does he have any in his possession today? Does Bush? Or Clinton? Hell, maybe the FBI should crash Jimmy Carter's personal residence. He'd probably have a better understanding of what they are and why they are there than Biden does.
Aseahawkfan wrote:It's overblown BS used for political marketing. If it were a real issue, we would have a Snowden like trial ages ago.
RiverDog wrote:Sure, a lot of it is overblown, but I think it raises serious questions about the stewardship of these documents. Why are they allowed to leave federal property in the first place? Is this standard practice? Have other Presidents and VP's taken classified documents to their personal offices and residences? Does Kamala Harris have any at her private residence? I can understand how Trump's left, he took them illegally then did not surrender them when requested. But how did Biden's go astray? Surely those that discovered them understood the significance given how publicized Trump's documents were, they were Biden's personal lawyers, and they read the news like everyone else. Did they tell him? If so, when was he told? As it was in Watergate, the cover up is worse than the crime.
It's a serious national security issue. They are classified for a reason. Some of the documents were mixed in with Biden's personal effects, like the funeral of his late son. And he has the gall to call Trump irresponsible.
In response to Cbob's observation about the State of the Union address, I doubt that Biden even mentions them. He'll talk about how inflation is coming down, gas prices are lower, the aid they're giving to Ukraine, maybe even Damar Hamlin's ordeal. But he won't talk about Documentgate. After all, the State of the Union is nothing more than a campaign speech without the placards. I don't even bother watching it.
Aseahawkfan wrote:It didn't become an issue until recently. After the emails and recent raid, we found out presidents and politicians do this as a standard procedure. Not sure how important the documents are, but likely mostly personal discussions on matters of government that become classified. It's likely a standard operating procedure and most of it is not classified enough that it is a major concern or I would hope our security agencies would be a lot more unhappy and angry.
curmudgeon wrote:It’s a non-issue. Biden is the best thing the US has ever seen…..
RiverDog wrote:There are three levels of classified documents:
According to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the three main levels of classified information are:
Top Secret: information would cause "exceptionally grave damage to the national security" if there were an unauthorized release.
Secret: information that would, with unauthorized release, be expected to cause "serious" damage to the national security.
Confidential: information that is determined to have the potential to cause danger to the national security with unauthorized release.
About 10% of the documents found at Biden's private office in DC were marked "top secret." Unless you're comfortable with information that would cause "exceptionally grave damage to the national security" being kept in private offices, it's not small potatoes. It's a big deal. These top secret documents weren't found until Biden's attorneys started cleaning out the place in anticipation of a move. They were stored there and forgotten.
I also want to know how common it is for a VP or POTUS to take top secret and other classified documents off government property to unsecured locations like private offices and residences. Has Kamala Harris taken any to her private office or residence? Did Obama do this? Did Dick Cheney or George Bush? How about Clinton and Gore? It's not good enough to excuse Biden just because his transgressions are not as serious as Trump's.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what- ... %20release.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -tank.html
RiverDog wrote:There are three levels of classified documents:
According to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the three main levels of classified information are:
Top Secret: information would cause "exceptionally grave damage to the national security" if there were an unauthorized release.
Secret: information that would, with unauthorized release, be expected to cause "serious" damage to the national security.
Confidential: information that is determined to have the potential to cause danger to the national security with unauthorized release.
About 10% of the documents found at Biden's private office in DC were marked "top secret." Unless you're comfortable with information that would cause "exceptionally grave damage to the national security" being kept in private offices, it's not small potatoes. It's a big deal. These top secret documents weren't found until Biden's attorneys started cleaning out the place in anticipation of a move. They were stored there and forgotten.
I also want to know how common it is for a VP or POTUS to take top secret and other classified documents off government property to unsecured locations like private offices and residences. Has Kamala Harris taken any to her private office or residence? Did Obama do this? Did Dick Cheney or George Bush? How about Clinton and Gore? It's not good enough to excuse Biden just because his transgressions are not as serious as Trump's.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what- ... %20release.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -tank.html
Aseahawkfan wrote:You beat me to it in the layers of classification.
I'm not in any way bothered by this information being in offices. I have never heard of a presidents private removed files causing a security issue until now. I know this practice has been going for some time. So no, I am not at all concerned, not in the slightest. I consider this political theater and a waste of time from the real issues afflicting America, more distraction and bread and circuses.
Dick Cheney ran his own email servers. As I told you and the information is documented in a variety of areas if you read on Cheney, Dick Cheney was a powerful enough man that the Clintons and Trump would have feared to cross him if they were going against him. Dick Cheney was far more corrupt and vicious than any of these clowns in office since he left. He rewrote laws to do what he wanted to do. He hired marketing executive and teams to change American viewpoints based on language. He was probably the most powerful VP in American history. He did worse things by a good measure than Trump or the Clintons, yet he remained off the radar because he knows how to handle power and keep things in-house.
Cheney is the one that turned torture into the term "enhanced interrogation" to bypass Geneva Convention and American laws against torture. He wrote the Cheney Doctrine to empower the presidency to declare war or take extreme measures to protect the nation with even the slightest chance of threat to America which allowed a wide latitude in the use of military force and intelligence AI and tracking that empowered by the Patriot Act to spy on Americans and Worldwide.
Trump is a fart compared to Dick Cheney's level of political ability and corruption. If Cheney were younger, Trump would not even have made it into office. That old guard of hardcore Republicans that knew how to handle power and the presidency are gone. Somehow Trump has filled that power vacuum. Not really sure why.
Trump is small potatoes compared to Cheney. Cheney is a truly frightening American politician, both within the American system and to men like Putin and Xi. Trump is a joke compared to Cheney. So is Biden. I would welcome a Cheney back at this point in time. A man that would look across the sea at Putin and Xi and make sure they knew what was going to happened if they overstepped their bounds.
Hawktawk wrote:Reported this morning there was an active intentional cover up of this document discovery . The FBI was being excluded from the investigation by DOJ.
Resign . I will not be happy if this senile dolt runs again . Our country is run by incompetent idiots .
NorthHawk wrote:So if these documents are so sensitive to National Security, why isn't there some type of "Custodian" of them to let the President or Vice President view them then take them back and return them to their secure
location from where they came?
It just seems rather odd that they would be classified so highly then have no record of what happens to them after being delivered to the President or administration. How many people who don't hold the proper
Security Clearance levels have access to them? How many are political operatives/strategists or other secretarial staff that might just be cleaning up have access?
It seems to me that the procedures need to be really tightened up if these are as sensitive as suggested by their classification.
RiverDog wrote:
I don't like Joe Biden any more than you do, but he's better than the alternative, ie Trump or DeSantis.
c_hawkbob wrote:Oh come on, DeSantis has gone from "don't say gay" to now saying "don't say black". Other than his packaging he's just like Trump. I don't see how you all can see his hate as somehow more benign than Trumps.
mykc14 wrote:Is he really? I know he's better than Trump but is he better than DeSantis? Biden is in the same vein and clearly is not as clean as the Dem's would want you to believe. DeSantis isn't perfect by any means and I can understand voting for Biden because he's better than Trump but unless some more serious stuff comes out about DeSantis I don't understand throwing a vote to the Dems. If you like Biden and think he is what America needs then I get it vote for him, but how is DeSantis this evil guy (like Trump) compared to Biden?
RiverDog wrote:It doesn't matter if we've never had a major issue that can be traced back to the leaking of unsecured classified information. The point is that it can happen. There are a lot of bad guys out there that would love to get their hands on them.
I discovered through my research that it is not uncommon for a POTUS or VP to take classified documents to their homes and offices, so in that regard, I probably overreacted. But what is uncommon is for them not to be returned promptly after they leave office. Up until Trump, it was always based on the honor system, that it was assumed that former POTUS's and VP's would always return the documents as part of their last day's housekeeping chores upon leaving office. The National Archives has neither the authority nor the staffing to account for and recover all of the documents the formers have in their possession. That needs to change. Heck, there are businesses that have better accounting of proprietary and employee information that they want to keep confidential than the government does of their classified documents.
When the Republicans asked to see the Secret Services' log of those that visited Biden's residence where the documents were stored, they were told that such records do not exist. Especially in this day and age of facial recognition and biometric data making such information so easy to obtain and catalog, I find that kind of negligence very concerning for a number of reasons, like protecting the lives of the formers and their families.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests