4XPIPS wrote:He should be wearing the guardian cap, who cares how ugly it looks. If the guardian cap has data prove it can lessen head trauma, then why not make it mandatory. If all were wearing it, it would be just time before we get used to looking at it.
c_hawkbob wrote:The violence of a hit is not always readily apparent by observation. The wreck that killed Dale Earnhardt was a pretty pedestrian looking crash by NASCAR standards. It'd be interesting if Tua carried either of those genes (as well as a much more persuasive reason to retire) but I wouldn't expect it.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I do not think the league should disqualify Tua. But I do think they should advise him to retire, ensure he has signed a legal document that he has been advised to retire, and then let him make his decision. Some people consider life changing money worth the risks. If they do, that is up to them.
River Dog wrote:I can see both sides. Yes, Tua is a grown adult and should be allowed to make decisions that impact his life. I know how I would react if someone told me that I couldn't drink a beer because it's unhealthy for me.
But on the other hand, the league has a moral obligation as an employer not to subject at-risk employees to known hazards that may cause them permanent harm even if they are fully aware of the risks. Are you going to let an 8-month pregnant woman palletize 50 lb cases even if she knows the risks and wants to?
River Dog wrote:I can see both sides. Yes, Tua is a grown adult and should be allowed to make decisions that impact his life. I know how I would react if someone told me that I couldn't drink a beer because it's unhealthy for me.
But on the other hand, the league has a moral obligation as an employer not to subject at-risk employees to known hazards that may cause them permanent harm even if they are fully aware of the risks. Are you going to let an 8-month pregnant woman palletize 50 lb cases even if she knows the risks and wants to?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Tua is an individual not putting anyone but himself at risk. Millions of dollars are at stake. The NFL is dangerous enough you could apply this criteria to every player but maybe kickers. Football is dangerous. It's part of the reason why we watch I would think. It's our American brutal group war sport. Take ground, physically dominate your opponent, work as a team almost like a military unit. No use pretending the employer has an obligation to safety anymore than we pretend that in boxing or any other similar business like infantry or something. Being unsafe is part of the job and you can't only improve that marginally. Anyone going in should know that. It's not like you play football at the pro level and go, "I didn't know people would try to wreck me when they tackle me. I better get out of this sport."
That would be like a boxer being surprised when someone is trying to punch your face in.
You chose an unsafe occupation, then don't be surprised when you get smashed. So don't even bring employer obligation for things like football or boxing or MMA. You know what you're getting into and made the choice to play a dangerous game. You don't get to claim employer obligation after that. You just have to make decisions as no one is forcing a person to play football and it isn't some required job we can't do without.
River Dog wrote:Committing suicide doesn't put others at risk, either, but I won't sit by and let a stranger jump out a window. Why do we have seat belt and motorcycle helmet laws? If I splatter my head on the pavement like a grapefruit it doesn't hurt anyone else. You can even make an argument that you're doing the government a favor by dying early and not causing the taxpayer to pay your SS and Medicare.
If you're the Miami Dolphins, do you let Tua come back knowing that they might be putting themselves in legal jeopardy if he were not to get back up from his next concussion?
Like I said, I can see both sides. It's a classic dilemma.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Employers can certainly prohibit certain activities based on a variety of conditions to protect themselves, but, there's really no liability here anymore for the NFL. The concussion lawsuit went through. CTE issues are at the forefront of safety policy. I would assume Tua has had to sign somewhere that he's aware of his concussions, that's he's aware of the danger his history poses and the NFL is held harmless if he chooses to continue to play.
I hate to see it though. Kuechley was carted off the field looking like he had no idea who or where he was. That's scary stuff. It's the players' call though.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:You’re not wrong, but it’s two very different worlds. Perhaps a players situation could get bad enough that the NFL will force them out, we haven’t seen it yet. There's no doubt in my mind that Tua has been checked out thoroughly in every instance of a concussion and has been well informed of the risks of continuing to play. Word is he’s seeing a neurologist right now. I would hope there’s a strong recommendation to hang it up.
NorthHawk wrote:There was a report this morning that Tua isn’t going to retire, but I would think that his family hasn’t yet been fully heard.
Users browsing this forum: Oly and 15 guests