VD holdout?

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Re: VD holdout?

Postby HumanCockroach » Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:55 pm

LOL.
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: VD holdout?

Postby Hawktown » Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:14 am

burrrton wrote:
I see a pattern of mismanagement and not taking care of the people you should be taking care of.


That's kind of the rub, isn't it?

I have no doubt you'll disagree, but I paid as close attention to this team at that time as anyone (as I'm sure you did, too), and Ruskell mismanaging the team was never an overwhelming theme if it was one at all (in fact everyone thought he was a pretty good exec, with Lofa et al as feathers in his cap at the time).

What would be my motivation to stay? Just because I said I wanted to at some point?


Not necessarily to stay, but to talk to him before you leave? Your boss, and "fans" of your company, sure as h3ll might think so!



Really? I seem to remember not EVER liking Ruskell and most people with football intelligence agreed. In the beginning of course you have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Also I never liked the finesse style the FO was going for in that era.
Hawktown
Legacy
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:15 pm
Location: Renton, WA 98058

Re: VD holdout?

Postby NorthHawk » Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:22 am

There was the Trust in Tim crowd (interesting in that he turned out to be a dumb tit) which I subscribed to when they finally got a decent MLB in Lofa.
After that first draft, things went downhill pretty quickly.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11321
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: VD holdout?

Postby Hawktown » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:19 pm

"Being the highest paid tight end at my position says a lot but when it comes down to it I'm not playing the game for money. It's about passion," Davis said. "I didn't let it get to me because the only thing I could focus on is football. One thing about me once the season starts, I'm 100 percent football and that's all."

You will find VD's quote in here. :twisted: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5559531
Hawktown
Legacy
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:15 pm
Location: Renton, WA 98058

Re: VD holdout?

Postby RiverDog » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:29 am

NorthHawk wrote:There was the Trust in Tim crowd (interesting in that he turned out to be a dumb tit) which I subscribed to when they finally got a decent MLB in Lofa.
After that first draft, things went downhill pretty quickly.


One of TR's problems was that he didn't make his first pick count. Not a single #1 draft pick yielded a solid starter. It was sorry, from the Branch trade to Lawrence Jackson to Kelly Jennings to Chris Spencer, not to mention things like losing Hutch or signing Housh. TR had more luck in the second round, with guys like Lofa and John Carlson. But striking out at the top of the draft killed us, which is one of the reasons why I get so uptight when I see us not fully utilizing that top pick.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: VD holdout?

Postby kalibane » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:27 am

I think the main problem for Tim Ruskell was his whole approach to being a GM. Ruskell was GM for 5 years. His top 6 draft choices during that time were:

Tatupu, Mebane, Unger, Bryant, Hill and Carlson (caveat: I'm only including Carlson because you did, IMO he really didn't contribute all that much) and it really took Pete Carroll figuring out how to use Bryant before he became a value.

Carroll and Schneider had 6 better picks in their first draft: Okung, Thomas, Tate, Thurmond, Chancellor and McCoy

It wasn't the first pick in the draft that was Ruskell's problem. It was the draft. That and his pathological committment to drafting and signing undersized "character" guys.
kalibane
Legacy
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: VD holdout?

Postby Futureite » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:17 am

Hawktown wrote:"Being the highest paid tight end at my position says a lot but when it comes down to it I'm not playing the game for money. It's about passion," Davis said. "I didn't let it get to me because the only thing I could focus on is football. One thing about me once the season starts, I'm 100 percent football and that's all."

You will find VD's quote in here. :twisted: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5559531


I am really beginning to dislike this guy again. What was the quote? "I'd rather play with ten men and get penalized alll the way down the field . . . .".

I think we should just let him sit. Let him work on his "brand" for awhile. I am sure that stock will spike nicely while you are holding out VD. Lol, brilliant business mind.
Futureite
Legacy
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: VD holdout?

Postby monkey » Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:09 pm

VD holdout?


No, I had a shot that cleared it right up.





:D
User avatar
monkey
Legacy
 
Posts: 1777
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:40 pm

Previous

Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests