What we’re seeing here is pretty typical dynamics in a locker room. When you have 53 guys on a roster, not everyone is going to get along. People have all sorts of different values, priorities and backgrounds, so they’re going to disagree on things, complain and fight. It happens in every locker room. What matters is whether they can play well enough to win together.
obiken wrote:Ok, but we don't need this right now C-bob the focus should be on the Panthers. We lose this game and we ARE in big trouble.
a loss won't sh!tcan the season.
burrrton wrote:
We'd be sitting on 3 wins with 9 left to play. That's a sh*tcanned season in all but the most technical sense.
obiken wrote:What I am now hearing on 1080 the fan here in Portland, and they got the story from The Bleacher Report, is that Players like Baldwin, Lynch, Sherman, and of course Harvin, are lining up against Russell Wilson. They feel he is too close to management. Now Jason Scukanec, is saying that they feel is he is not "black" enough. It happens with light skin blacks vs. dark skin blacks. That explains why Lynch almost didn't get on the bus when he heard of the Harvin cut. IF this is ALL true, its just crap we don't need right now. Harvin's a good cut, Lynch would be a disaster. We don't need the House boy, Oreo, stuff. We finally get the best QB we have ever had and we might lose him. It all sounds like reverse racism to me. Scukanec, says when he played he saw it first hand in NFL locker rooms.
And we thought the enemy was imploding. IF we lose Sunday its over this year. We will see. Hopefully its all just BS.
c_hawkbob wrote:Being "more black" or "more white", "more thug" or "more redneck", "more refined" or "more country", "more democrat" or "more republican", is all a way of saying "more like me". It's all a matter of individual perspective usually spoken around those that are "more like you" about those that are not so much like you.
Of course it's real and of course it happens all the time. Also of course it also ain't no real thang to get all twitterpated about.
c_hawkbob wrote:9 left to play could get you there without the three wins. This game is important, but no where near a season-ender to all but the most reactionary fans.
c_hawkbob wrote:So you're taking issue with what I didn't say ...
RiverDog wrote:No, but I attaching a little more importance to the outcome of this game than you appear to be.
c_hawkbob wrote:
To be fair I was simply countering the contention that the season is "a sh*tcanned season in all but the most technical sense" with another loss. So I was just attaching a little less chicken little to a previous post.
Danny 710ESPNSeattle@DDMon7103h3 hours agoI found @mikefreemanNFL's source:
c_hawkbob wrote:To be fair I was simply countering the contention that the season is "a sh*tcanned season in all but the most technical sense" with another loss. So I was just attaching a little less chicken little to a previous post.
Even if we lose, it's not a "sh#t canned season".
you're either in it, or out of it, there is no grey "sh!tcanned" season.
NYG won a SB not that long ago if I recall, that surely 90% of the folks in here would have called a "sh!tcanned" season by week 6.
burrrton wrote:I wasn't using "sh*t-canned" to mean "I'll quit watching", which I've never done in any season since 1978.
I'm using it in the "We're not going anywhere this year" sense, and I still think 3-4 after a three game losing streak would pretty much amount to that.
Uppercut wrote:Interesting comment from Barkley on the subject. Bet its goin to make some cringe.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/25/charles-barkley-unintelligent-blacks-brainwashed-to-keep-successful-black-men-down-video/
Users browsing this forum: jshawaii22 and 14 guests