NorthHawk wrote:I've been harping about the OL the last couple of years, too but I don't know how much emphasis they put on it from a big picture point of view.
Certainly they can get better along the line and health is a big part of it, but even when relatively healthy they have been a weak spot of this team.
Perhaps it has to do with the general philosophy of a Defensive HC, just like Defense wasn't a priority with Holmgren.
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Winning cures all ills, and when we were winning the coaching staff figured that their personell on the O-Line were "adequate". I am going to keep beating that poor old dead horse, but this is what happens when you draft poorly at the top of the draft and trade draft picks for whom you get little to no return on. It had to catch up to our Seahawks and it has. It has not only affected the O-Line though it has affected the D-Line and Wr's too.
How many people remember Chicago bear Bob Avelinni?? He was a QB for the Bears in the 1970's and man could that run the ball, couldn't pass worth a darn but he set all kinds of NFL records for QB's running the ball in his short stint in the NFL. Records that are in danger of being surpassed by Russell Wilson.
I might be the only one in here who believes that our pass blocking has been as "adequate" as our run blocking this season. We were told that the reason RW didn't throw the ball more was that he didn't need to because we had the best defense in the league. But, rest assured, if we NEEDED RW to throw the ball more he could and would do so. It turns out, no he can't. All he could muster for last Sunday's game was 178 yards, A BUCK SEVENTY-EIGHT!!! He couldn't even approach the "Mendoza" Line for goodness sakes! Were we sold a false bill of goods? I know our pass blocking hasn't been great but you give a Peyton Manning or a Tom Brady the same amount of time and they will pick your team apart. RW is just missing too many open receivers either by throwing a bad pass or in many cases just not seeing them.
I am NOT the only one saying these seemingly traitorous things, all of the sports radio shows have been talking about our QB's lack of effectiveness too.
I am so depressed about this season because right now, the way they have played, I don't see another win on their schedule, not even at home. I knew this stretch was going to be brutal but with all of the injuries and a QB who seems to be in a permanent funk I just don't see how they can win. The games will be close, but close but no cigar.
The POPE wrote:I think Russell will be fine if he is given time to throw the ball and weapons to throw to. The biggest concern for me is the almost total dependency on the run game. I do not advocate a Green Bay style offense where we throw 70+ percent of the time. Just the ability to be a little more balanced. Yes they draft o-line for the ability to run block and the 'hope' Mr. Cable can teach them to pass block. The problem is that this has not happened. Sure the injuries don't help, but the pass blocking is not much better when the starting line is all together. Like I said earlier the defense was able to pick up the slack last year, this year not. This makes the o-line issues are even more apparent since the Hawks can't convert 3rd down at an efficient rate. Thus all those games that the Hawks won last year by minimal margins have gone away this year. Throughout it all the one major weakness has been o-line play. This is why I question Mr Cable. It's his responsibility. If we look back at his time in Oakland I'm pretty sure the same analysis could be made--good run game, poor pass protection. Cmon Tom, teach these guys to pass block. And Pete/John ain't off the hook for this either, they r ultimately responsible.
For those of you contemplating Seahawks suicide give me a call at 1-800-Vatican. We will give guidance to your troubled souls.![]()
pope--out
NorthHawk wrote:Would Fangio stay if Quinn was hired?
It seems to me that with the success of the 49ers D, he might be upset he didn't get the chance.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests