kalibane wrote:Yeah I saw this a couple days ago. And his post game press conference was a joke as usual. We kept trying to tell a certain person that there was definitely a difference in character between Wilson and Kaep, but nooooo we were just being homers.
I've been one of the few guys to stick up for Kaep (overall at least, I always hated his post loss interview style) but it's getting to the point where I start to wonder whether he's got what it takes between the ears (not talking about intelligence) to handle being a star QB.
kalibane wrote:I don't even think it's the standing in the pocket thing to be honest. I think his issues (on the field at least) boil down to three things.
1. Progressions. He has regressed massively even just from preseason. When his first read isn't there he gets confused and starts forcing throws. He almost never hits his check down. It causes him to hold the ball too long and take too many sacks. His first INT against Oakland and the INT in the NFC championship games are perfect examples. He didn't take the sack but he did worse. He had check down receivers open but instead he forced the ball up the field into coverage.
2. His eyes come down when he scrambles for the most part. When Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck and Russell Wilson scramble, their eyes almost never come down, they are constantly scanning the field when the play breaks down looking for a receiver to break open. When Kaep starts scrambling his eyes almost always come down. He'll bring them back up if the rush isn't right on top of him but he brings them down and loses track of his WRs. He's not a strictly tuck and run guy. He'll look for receivers but only after he feels he's in the clear.. so again causes him to hold the ball too long and he takes sacks.
3. He never throws guys open. He has to see the receiver open and then rifles it in instead of anticipating where his WRs will break open enough to make the catch. Consequently he has smaller windows to fit the ball into.
Now because teams have adjusted to him somewhat, for instance the Raiders just didn't send an aggressive pass rush up the field... they played practically pure contain. He has gotten frustrated and he's even getting worse.
kalibane wrote:There was no place to put that ball Riv. There just wasn't. I don't know how many times Sherman is going to break up or intercept passes on deep sideline routes before people just realize you don't throw that against him. He has perfect technique. And the only reason it even looked close was because Crabtree got away with pushing off. If he threw the ball higher or longer it's just an incompletion. Maybe on an absolutely perfect tear drop throw at the back corner of the endzone with the WR doing their best Cris Carter imitation with the toe tapping was going to result in a TD, but that requires touch. Maybe. Even Aaron Rodgers would be lucky get that pass in there and he can throw with more than twice as much touch than Kaep could ever dream of having at this point.
When people say that if he threw it deeper it could have gotten over Sherman they act like Sherman was at the limit of his range or something. He would have just kept drifting back and riding Crabtree towards the side line. Have to realize that in order to get the ball deeper where the ball would still be catchable the trajectory of the throw has to change. QB has to put more air under the ball. And the truth of the matter is the longer the ball is in the air the more it benefits Sherman making a play.
That throw is more defensible if you were playing with a receiver like Dez Bryant or Calvin Johnson who can out jump and actually come over the top of corners to pluck that ball out of the air before the corner can bat the ball away but Crabtree is not that guy, never been that guy and never will be that guy.
His check down was WIDE open. The right play was to check down use a time out and get three more shots at the end zone.
Hawktawk wrote:Ive heard all about how intelligent Kap is, what a nice guy he is. I sure dont see it.Hes been an immature antisocial clown.
I suppose the coaching staff mishandled him. Hes an unconventional QB and asking him to sit in the pocket and go through progressions is never going to be his thing. His wheels need to be a huge part of the equation along with Gores wheels. But one read and hes still confused?Thats on him I think hes hearing footsteps, seeing the rush and not the field. Lots of guys get like that and they are toast. I see Kap as a Vince Young, Mike Vick type of guy. Superior athlete with a huge arm but an inability to lead a team or properly represent a a franchise publicly. I think hes like a meteor show, burned really bright for a while then PFFFFT show over..
kalibane wrote:Riv there were 30 seconds on the clock not 20 and he had two timeouts. That is way more than enough time to hit your check down and call timeout with 20-23 seconds and still have three shots at the end zone.
You're telling me that as a Seahawk fan you'd rather the niners had first and goal from the 10 yard line or so, with 20 seconds and a timeout than Colin Kaepernick taking a shot in the end zone against blanket coverage on a pattern that Sherman has more interceptions than receptions allowed over the course of his career?
And that's not a joke, I charted Sherman's games this summer when Future wouldn't give up the ghost about this play. When opposing QBs throw to a WR running a deep sideline route against Sherman he has intercepted the ball more times than he's given up a reception. If I remember correctly up to that point Sherman had only given up 3 receptions on deep sideline routes. I think Kaepernick himself has thrown 3 INTs to Sherman on those types of routes.
Futureite wrote:Wow, lol, just reading these posts for the first time. When the going gets tough, some people pile on. Others jump ship (I am talking to you, SF Jersey burners). I still love the kid, man - however you want to characterize him - and I believe he can be a great QB. I am not one to jump ship. Actually hoping to go to the game in Seattle. Maybe one or more of you want to meet up before hand? You all clearly have the upper hand now, and us winning is a longshot. But I am ok with the ribbing. Coffee maybe?
HumanCockroach wrote:Half of your post is inaccurate, and wrong.
kalibane wrote:
When has the truth ever gotten in the way of Future demonstrating his football IQ?
The running game/defense line of reasoning is so trite. Two words: Troy Aikman. Go look up that guy's gaudy stats and he had an infinitely better offensive line and receivers and yet ...first ballot hall of famer. So seriously... STFU
Futureite wrote:
I have no problems whatsoever with the 49ers trying to "convert" Kap. Carroll has clearly chosen to do the opposite with RW and utilize his full skill set and put him in position to make plays now. At first I thought that approach was ridiculous. I viewed it as a complete "win now" approach with a QB at the expense of his longterm development or success. LOL, but maybe "winning now" means winning for the next 10 years.
Futureite wrote:Kalibane;
RW is not Troy Aikman. Or Manning or even Matt Ryan. I would take any number of guys over him to run a prostyle O. I am not "trolling". Just giving my honest opinion. Yes, RW does make better decisions than Kap, and he is a better QB at this point (and may always be). But that does not mean that he is or has ever been built to play from the pocket.
Troy Aikman was a classic pocket passer - a big, strong armed guy with limited mobility. I like RW as a QB, but he is not a polished pocket passer. He is not a rhythm thrower. This Seattle O that he runs has been hashed out many times by many knowledgeable people. Cosell called it "rudimentary for the past 3 years" in a recent interview, and before the NFC Championchip game Dilfer stated that "they are running a college type O, trying to manufacture yards in any way possible" [paraphrase]. Many knowledgeable NFL people have made similar observations. One can see this with the naked eye, with no football knowledge whatsoever. RW is quick to leave the pocket, he has a lot of designed runs, and he makes the majority of his big chunk yardage plays from improvisation. The Thursday Night game was a microcosm of how he's played his entire career. He frustrated our rush and hit two big plays on TE/RB leaks or screens. That is what he has always done, with big splash playaction shots mixed in.
If it works it works. Who cares? You just won the SB. Again......he does not have to be anything other than what he is for the Seahawks to win. This is not to say he could "not" be a great pure passer, but it takes years to become that. If you read Steve Young's recent article, he stated that to become a great QB it takes (1) The right training or coaching, (2) Hours of meticulous study and training of the right training. Think about how long it took Drew Brees to become what he is after starting his career in a Seattle type O with San Diego. It took him years under Peyton to become who he is.
I do not see RW getting that training under Carroll/Bevel. And what I do see is that every time he struggles, they abandon ship and go right back to the D/Heavy Run/Read Option game plan. They are not developing this kid, at all. And it shows when he is asked to carry the O. Sure, he has games like the Ram game where his scrambling and improvisation kill teams. But he also has a lot of games like Dallas, where when his mobility is taken away, he just looks lost. I do think he could be a truly "great" QB - a Joe Montana - but not in this scheme playing this way.
Be happy your team will probably dominate ours tomorrow. Take care and enjoy the game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests