
Long Time Fan wrote:I am sick to death of the pre-snap penalties. I'm disappointed in Britt's lack of progress. I want Unger back to anchor this held together by bailing wire bunch. I'd like to see Okung stay healthy, but I do appreciate Bailey. Thank goodness the run blocking is a level better than the pass blocking.
Hard to imagine how good this team could be with moderately improved oline play.
I don't think Cable has the answers.
Zorn76 wrote:
The quick pass he had to Baldwin to get a 1st down on 3rd and 5 is what I'd like to see more of. We actually had a bubble screen or two work Sunday, but I think there's room for more routes that are closer to 1st down marker in the middle of the field.
Hawktawk wrote:That a very nice breakdown of our O line. Thank goodness we have a running back and a QB who can be effective with poor line play.
Just a thought. I was kind of surprised Arians went around his #2 and started a guy with 7 picks and no TDs in his career.
I wonder if Arians decided to hide the rook from Seattle's film study, give him some practice reps and yank Lindley early if he isn't producing?Either way I have a feeling we will see that big rookie at some point during the game.
NorthHawk wrote:Zorn76 wrote:
I'm wondering when they are going to send Richardson deep to use his speed and perhaps get the Defense thinking about it.
Anthony wrote:Given Rw is under pressure a league leading 46.1% of his drop backs, and it is not close, you can see why he does not have time to throw deep unless he creates it. FYI he is also a league leading 68.* % accuracy under pressure and again not close.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2300 ... e-seahawks
Add to that QB leading rushing yards and tds, 15th over all in rushing and it is easy to see how this offense would be screwed without him. Now imagine if we could get his some help in the form of an avg pass blocking oline(we are ranked 23rd) and stud WR.
HumanCockroach wrote:Lot more to it than that Anthony, you are taking a very narrow view on the subject. How many SB's does he want to win? Does he want to go to a team that has LESS results, like you said, results matter, and to the best of my knowledge, NO ONE has had better results in the last three years ( yhis entire career) than Seattle. Does he want to go to a team that can't win if he has a down spell? Does he want Manning numbers, and only one title or does he want lower numbers and multiple Lombardi's ( ala Aikmen) really there are thousands of questions to be asked, and no one knows those answers except for one man, and unfortunately, his name isn't Anthony, or Roach or Bob, or River or North or etc. NO ONE knows what the future holds for Wilson, and claiming that "this" game is the deciding factor seems so far out there man.
I kind of doubt that Wilson sees it the same way as you. They DID address the WR position, right?? I mean they DID invest heavily into it, and provided Wilson with an "elite" explosive receiver right? Whatever the outcome of that move was, it isn't like they did not do it. How many Mega Trons do you think are running around out there?? Seriously man I doubt Wilson is foggy about it. They seldom are available, and even LESS seldom available when a team that perennially are winning have access to them. It is unrealistic to think Seattle can just go grab one. The same holds true for special lineman, if these things were so easy to come by, the Hawks would have them, hell EVERY team would have them, doesn't work that way, and I would guess Wilson grasps that concept better than you or I.
Anthony wrote:
This game worries me a lot, and could go a long way in deciding not just this year but the next few as this could be the nail in our coffin of keeping RW. And please before anyone says they will franchise him, no they will not. If Rw decides he doe snot want to be here for all the reasons I mentioned, he will hold out and only come in once they agree not to franchise him and then he will be gone.
FYI our oline now ranks 28th in pass blocking.
jshawaii22 wrote:Here's a reaction from last week as it relates to this week by ESPN... not a favorable comment or two, now is it, you know that part about "being under duress" while dropping back.
if upcoming opponent Arizona wants to know how to keep Wilson in check, a look at what the 49ers did defensively might be a clue. Wilson completed a season-low 27 percent of his passes against five or more pass rushers, including an interception.
He was 3-for-11 against the 49ers' blitz with an average of only 5.7 yards per throw. Wilson also was 0-for-8 throwing while under duress, the most attempts without a completion by a player in a game this season.
js
jshawaii22 wrote:Here's a reaction from last week as it relates to this week by ESPN... not a favorable comment or two, now is it, you know that part about "being under duress" while dropping back.
if upcoming opponent Arizona wants to know how to keep Wilson in check, a look at what the 49ers did defensively might be a clue. Wilson completed a season-low 27 percent of his passes against five or more pass rushers, including an interception.
He was 3-for-11 against the 49ers' blitz with an average of only 5.7 yards per throw. Wilson also was 0-for-8 throwing while under duress, the most attempts without a completion by a player in a game this season.
js
mykc14 wrote:
There is no way that the Hawks would do that, come on. If he were, in someway, unwilling to resign with us we would absolutely f-tag him and if he somehow held out we would just let him. The hawks hold the cards in that scenario. What have you seen in his character over the last 3 years that would lead you to believe that he would do that and turn down some sort of reasonable offer from the Hawks? He obvoiusly loves PC and JS. This is the team that was willing to take a chance on him. He has the best D in the NFL and could be part of many SB championships. He has been nothing but a team first guy and that will not change. Don't worry about this happening because there is no way in hell that it does (unless somehow the Hawks were to seriously low-ball him, which I do not see happening either).
HumanCockroach wrote:Sounds to me like you are saying it's tbhe offense scheme. This IS an above average line, and it isn't rocket science to figure out what area they excell in, they run block, it IS what this team is built for. The HAVE invested and invested HEAVILY in the receiver core, both in dollars and picks, also not hard to see. Whether Rice can stay on the field ( obviously not) or Harvin can get his own headd out of his arse, the money, picks and investments have been there. Multiple picks, and quite a few dollars have likewise been invested on that line as well.
Those things are simply fact, and no matter if the desired results have been gained, they will remain the facts. If Joe was still playing I would endorse his signing, but the truth is, he isn't, and finding him isn't as simple as saying, go get him. Most receivers aren't going to be chomping on the bit to come into a run heavy offense, which leaves Seattle exactly where they have been, which is either draft one ( which they continue to try to do over and over again) find one in free agency ( something they have also attempted) snag one via unconventional methods, ie CFL or some other league ( something they have also attempted) or pony up a ton of cash/ trade/ picks ( also attempted) .....
People may not be happy with the return on those investments, but it simply isn't for lack of trying, and that remains the truth. I would like to think that an uber intelligent QB would see that, understand that, and not base that big of a decision on simply selfishness and pettiness, but ultimately, I don't know, and neither does anyone else here.
As for the line, eh, I'm not going to get into some long drawn out debate about the "quality" of said line, it is what it is. They are what Seattle has, after numerous and constant play with it. Wilson DOES own some responsibility in some of the protection problems ( for instance he had a pocket in the Philly game for 9 seconds, and NEVER delivered the ball) and anyone claiming that there isn't "timing" issues on some of those plays, isn't watching the game. Yes Wilson has to move far to much, however, often times the line is asked to guess which way he is moving, LONG after a ball should have been delivered.
With a QB that extends plays, and holds the ball, pressures and sacks come with it, something I've pointed out before, it goes hand in hand with how Wilson plays the game. If Wilson leaves for the reasons you profess, that is far more on the staff and the system, than the individual players you seem hell bent on blaming. Simply put, Seattle will NOT be passing the ball 50 times a game, unless they HAVE TO any time in the near future.
I have seen you professing the doomsday injury scenario for almost three full seasons Anthony, it hasn't come to pass, and simply put, that is a HELL of a good stretch for ANY QB with or without the aforementioned receivers or line, so something is working fine.
jshawaii22 wrote:That's a very interesting scenario... that Russell would leave the team he wanted to be drafted by... simply because the salary cap and other issues have given him a crappy OLine for 3 years. Hmmm... never say never, but I wouldn't bet much on that one. If anything, it will be the other way around and he will sign something team friendly like Kaepernick did to allow us to keep what we have together and maybe sign that help we need.
I also believe that in Russells world as sports in general, the rings the things and nowhere else in the NFL do they need a QB with a team already in place to do that. We are built for the decade. He goes backwards with anyone else.
js
Anthony wrote:
Simple he wants to be the best Qb ever, he has said that, unless the Hawks change their philosophy and get him weapons and a better oline it will not happen here. Being a team first guy is great and he is, but now it is his "Me time; like any athlete. Also I hate to tell you the FO doe snot have the leverage. The hawks have no other real Qb that can keep this team relevant, If he decided he was not going to resign here, and held out because he knew they would put the tag on him, either they would agre not to so he would come in, or he would not come in and our chances of winning go down huge. I am just saying it is a possibility, he wants to be the best this FO has done little to put him in position to do that. They only way he stays is if 1 they make a reasonable offer, and 2 they agree to get him weapons and an oline and let him throw more. Now all that said I can see them doing just that. But we will see.
Anthony wrote:
Goes backwards. So if he went to say Houston with that defense, that RB, a top 15 pass blocking oline, Hopkins and Johnson and he step backwards really? Guess what not only does he not step backwards but he jumps forward big time, AFC, 2 big time Wrs, top 15 pass blocking oline. Yeah a huge jump would be coming.
Do not get me wrong I want Wilson to stay, I have been a fan for years waiting for a Franchise QB. We have one, but we are not giving him the tools to succeed. He is succeeding despite the tools, not with them.
NorthHawk wrote:I think the OL run blocking is skewed in the positive by Lynch and his abilities as a RB.
I really doubt they are as good as the stats show. We don't see consistent runs by Turbin or Michael early in the game (Lynch takes up most of the carries early), and Wilson's runs aren't often as a result of good run blocking, so the stats might be misleading.
I'm still of the mind the OL needs a serious upgrade both for the run game and passing game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests