Hahahaha. Are you the same guy that defended that roughing the passer call when we played up in Seattle just weeks ago? Something must have changed between now and then.
That call against Detroit was probably incorrect but it was not really agregious and it did not even come close to putting them in a guaranteed win even if it had stood. There was plenty of game left and even had they kicked a FG from it it's still a one score game. If anything Dallas gave them a mulligan by fumbling back the strip sack. But I can understand why you want to blow this up and dish on Dallas, because they already beat you in your place.
No, as I said it was a textbook hit and a horrible call ( really you should maybe stop putting words into peoples mouths) I did say it did not cost SF the game, as the offense actually improved after that blown call..... But hey, just insert whatever you feel like, wherever you want to.
As for Dallas, please let them find a way to beat GB, please, please, please. Not in the SLIGHTEST concerned about that half a team, in Seattle, without a player to force feed the ball too, sapping carries from Lynch.
So in essence you are not only wrong, but damn wrong, with a few lies thrown in to boot. I don't "defend" horrible calls, whether they be for or against the Seahawks, not my bag. If they are correct, I say so, if they are blown ( like the call you said I defended) I say so as well... If Seattle gets the benefit, eh, I'll take it, as there is quite a bit of red in the "blown call" ledger against Seattle, and it would take literally thousands to "balance" said ledger, that said, you can skip the accusations about things I never said or posted.
