curmudgeon wrote:Before the team leaves Phoenix...
NorthHawk wrote:I think this last play call will follow him in his career if he is ever considered as a HC so we're stuck with him unless Pete decides otherwise.
Did the game and situation get too big for him?
Seahawks4Ever wrote:Just so you know, I stopped watching last night just before the trophy presentation, I just couldn't watch it. This is the first time I have seen or read any commentary about the game, I have NOT heard what Bevell said. This IS what I remembered seeing;
Lockette should have run to where Wilson threw the ball instead of stopping in his route and then trying to catch the ball. After what Lockette did it was easy for the rookie Butler to jump the route. If Lockette sells out it would have been a TD.
That said and done, why oh why didn't they just FEED THE BEAST!!!! Oh my, we had that game in the bag. We were in total control, and for once we were going to finish right, and not give Tom Brady enough time on the clock to come back and win the game. Then, the bottom fell out. Why oh why didn't they just either hand it to the Beast, or even fake it to the Beast and Russell Wilson carry it on in???? We were so in control of our own destiny, and oh what a destiny. Then WHAM! I was licked in the gut.
But, we will be BACK! Just you wait and see. Since we only beat ourselves and gave it to the Pats we will be back next year to rectify the situation!
Hawktawk wrote:Hindsight is 20-20. After rewinding and watching that last play too damn many times I think everyone involved in the play bears some responsibility. Bevell for calling it, Carroll for approving it, and RW and Lockette for botching the execution.Lockette was late and so was Wilson. I'm not even necessarily of the camp that says we had to hand it off there. A 2nd down pass isn't necessarily a bad thing. You just couldn't throw that pass to that reciever in the situation.It was a weird call. Big Balls PC got burned. But he was a hero going for it with 6 seconds left in the half. I was screaming FG on that one.
I know everyone is depressed and I am too but I feel sort of like I did after that Atlanta loss in the 2012 postseason. This story is far from being written. This team has a good chance to get back again a few times.
Hawktawk wrote:I hate to say it but Brandon Browner deserves some credit on the play too. It was supposed to be a pick play but Browner jammed Kearse and slowed the play down. That freed the corner up to just fire on the route.
NE was absolutely ready for the play. I wonder if they had our radio frequency:-(
RiverDog wrote:
Butler definitely sniffed it out. If he had guessed wrong and Lockette had cut to his right instead of continuing across the middle, there was no one behind him, and an easy TD.
Butler definitely sniffed it out. If he had guessed wrong and Lockette had cut to his right instead of continuing across the middle, there was no one behind him, and an easy TD.
is the real problem.We sent in our personnel, they sent in goalline, it's not the right matchup for us to run the football, so on second down we throw the ball really to kind of waste that play. If we score we do, if we don't, then we'll run it in on third and fourth down.
obiken wrote:Chill pill everyone, and I say that as a guy that should have eaten them by the handfuls in the past on draft day!!
Yes the call was the worst, no defense for it. The worst call of all time. However, Bevell has taken an offense that is not very consistent, with a qb, that the jury is still out on his pocket passing ability, and turned it into a big play offense that compliments our defense, and OBTW we have gone to two SB's We wont know how good RW is till beast leaves. He might just be Phil Simms. All great teams need a qb that doesn't make mistakes and hits the open guy. Come on Mary Rypien won a ring. Hostettler won a ring.
obiken wrote:All I'm saying is do you fire a guy for one bad call.
obiken wrote:All I'm saying is do you fire a guy for one bad call.
briwas101 wrote:We don't deserve to win the super bowl again if we keep bevell. Its that simple.
Coaches/coordinators should not ever be the one to lose a game. EVER.
Coaches and coordinators don't have to make the team "better" but they cannot be allowed to make the team worse.
Bevell lost us not just a game, but THE MOTHER EFFING SUPER BOWL.
Besides, our offense is built around Lynch with the run, and Wilson improvising in the pass/run game. Bevell deserves exactly 0% of the credit for our success. None. Bevell has NOTHING to do with the Seahawks success. We would be just as successful with any random OC, except we wouldn't have to worry about boneheaded decisions to abandon the run.
Bevell has proven over the years to be among the worst OC ever, so once again the Hawks do not deserve to win another Super Bowl until we fire the guy that just lost it for us.
I hope someone physically hurts bevell so bad that hes afraid to step foot in Washington. I want him hospitalized long-term.
I-5 wrote:I agree with Anthony, that the mistake was in not letting Wilson control the ball via zone read, play action, rollout.
If you fire Bevell, who do you replace him with? Hopefully he's learned not to get cute, but to me he's still the best OC for Wilson and this offense.
NorthHawk wrote:
That's a good question. Any OC would have to be conservative by nature to fit into Pete's philosophy.
I'm sure there are a few around, but I would bet they would get frustrated over time with our conservative approach.
obiken wrote:All I'm saying is do you fire a guy for one bad call.
The thing I think is interesting is the play before half we scored on, it was Wilson who wanted it, called the play and convinced PC to do it. Sounds familiar but it seems almost every big play we have is either Wilson calling it, or him improvising and doing it. Makes you wonder if Wilson should not be his own OC.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests