HawkWow wrote:I will be sick to my stomach if ASJ is left on the board after we pick @32. No homerism. He'd just make a ton of sense (as would a rangy WR or OL).
kalibane wrote:i just think it's hilarious that Kiper is trying to over compensate for how stupid he looked regarding Russell Wilson by putting Manziel on top of his big board and citing Brees and Wilson as the reasoning.
Steady_Hawk wrote:HawkWow wrote:I will be sick to my stomach if ASJ is left on the board after we pick @32. No homerism. He'd just make a ton of sense (as would a rangy WR or OL).
I couldn't imagine them passing on him either. Ultra talented and HUGE. Plus, we could get rid of Miller's big numbers and get even younger on Offense. I'm not sure how unhappy our FO is with Breno. Sometimes I think he actually does a decent job at RT.
NorthHawk wrote:Take Richardson if he's still on the board. Play him at RT and slide him over to LT when Okung has his yearly injury. Then when Okung's contract is up we have some leverage and a ready replacement at a much lesser cap hit should it come to that. We don't want to go through the same problems as when Walt retired.
We have to upgrade the OL as a top priority.
RiverDog wrote:Hey, ObS! Nice to see you around.
I agree with the priorities, either OL or a big WR. As much as people hate to admit it, there is a major disadvantage to having the shortest starting QB in the league, and that is that the trajectory of his passes have to have more arch on them than a taller QB. The fact that our WR's are so short, with Tate and Harvin being under 6', makes this disadvantage even more dramatic. Russell had a much better year with Sid Rice in the lineup than he's having this year with Tate, Baldwin, and Kearse. I'm also very uneasy about having placed so much faith in Percy Harvin.
But if a stud OL falls to us, I'm fine with us snapping him up. IMO we go with the best player available at those two positions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests