Aseahawkfan wrote:Because he's a narcissistic clown that can't admit when he's wrong. Always been that way and likely a trait that has gotten worse with age. He's used to being the emperor and no one telling him he has no clothes or they're fired. The man's a control freak and he treats The White House like his company.
We need to wait for Idhawkman to show up to give us the Trumpbot news spin.
Aseahawkfan wrote:RD, did you watch Conan in Greenland on Youtube? It's hilarious. Check it out.
"He's deteriorating in plain sight," one Republican strategist who's in frequent contact with the White House told Insider on Friday.
Asked why the president was obsessed with Alabama instead of the states that would actually be affected by the storm, the strategist said, "you should ask a psychiatrist about that; I'm not sure I'm qualified to comment."
c_hawkbob wrote:Looks to me like Hawktawk isn't as far off the chain as many of you guys have been saying he is ...
"He's deteriorating in plain sight," one Republican strategist who's in frequent contact with the White House told Insider on Friday.
Asked why the president was obsessed with Alabama instead of the states that would actually be affected by the storm, the strategist said, "you should ask a psychiatrist about that; I'm not sure I'm qualified to comment."
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-a ... ?r=US&IR=T
RiverDog wrote:Speaking for myself, it's been Hawktalk's rhetoric that's off the chain more than it is the content of his musings.
In one breath, the "Republican strategist" says Trump's deteriorating in plain sight, and the next breath says he's not qualified to comment? There's been scores of reports of Trump's odd behavior from a variety of sources. I'm not sure what makes this one any different.
From my vantage point 3,000 miles from the Beltway, Trump hasn't changed his demeanor since he started running for office. Nothing he says surprises me.
Hawktawk wrote:What's so wrong with my rhetoric?
Hawktawk wrote:What's so wrong with my rhetoric? I'm the first one on this forum to say he's nuts and he clearly is and this Alabama thing is the most recent example. His narcissism is PATHOLOGICAL as is his dishonesty. His twitter blizzards would get him fired from any management job in America. He can't keep the same train of thought for a minute unless it involves being a racist lawless clown or disputing some falsely perceived slight or grievance.As I've said just google anything he was saying on camera 20 or 30 years ago and compare it to the man now with his perpetual scowl, bug eyes, OCD behavior and soulless personality. He was always unwilling to admit being wrong as he felt it made him look "weak" although he's got that ass backwards.But he could at least appear coherent, linguistically adept and even glib and funny at times.Now he is clearly mentally in great decline and the very worst parts of his personality are becoming more dominant and amplified.
What's going on between the ears with this guy who controls our foreign affairs and armed forces cannot be explained by aging and its truly frightening to me and should be to anyone. I was in favor of invoking the 25th amendment weeks into his term and it was brought to light that members of the administration were thinking the same thing around the same time so where was I wrong ?
I was the first on this forum to reject him as anyone I could ever support maybe a week into his candidacy and as a lifelong Republican straight ticket voter since 1978 I am extremely credible a #nevertrump# charter member.
I knew exactly what would happen if he were the president and frankly it's been worse than I could even imagine. This is by far the worst, most unstable unqualified *man* ever to occupy the office. When I say he's the crazy orange witch it just a fact. He's crazy and as a bipolar but medicated man I know whereof I speak, he's a lot crazier than me and I wouldnt want to be a train engineer, pilot or god forbid commander in chief. Hes orange other than the ridiculous looking white raccoon eyes from his tanning bed goggles. And he's the witch the mueller witch hunt caught red handed colluding with our greatest geopolitical foe and clearly laid out a case for obstruction of justice that over 1000 former federal prosecutors signed a letter stating would have gotten anyone else on the planet indicted.
Frankly Bob Mueller was way too easy on the scumbag piece of sh!+. Oh I guess i better watch my rhetoric right RD???![]()
![]()
As for ID Hawk and also Burrton they are definitely awol from this side of the forum and we probably all should be for a few months barring some really shocking thing but nothing shocks america with this ass clown anymore. Hes dumbed down the office to the gutter.
c_hawkbob wrote:"He's deteriorating in plain sight," one Republican strategist who's in frequent contact with the White House told Insider on Friday.
Asked why the president was obsessed with Alabama instead of the states that would actually be affected by the storm, the strategist said, "you should ask a psychiatrist about that; I'm not sure I'm qualified to comment."
Hawktawk wrote:What’s bad is that people say that since the economy is good and unemployment is low it’s ok to have a nut who is destroying the dignity of the office, ruining nato, coddling dictators and serving fast food to world and national champions who have earned a black tie affair. The economy is like an aircraft carrier. It takes a long time to turn around but when it does it might sink this time with all the reckless moves he’s making and I doubt China will bail us out.
Hawktawk wrote:What’s bad is that people say that since the economy is good and unemployment is low it’s ok to have a nut who is destroying the dignity of the office, ruining nato, coddling dictators and serving fast food to world and national champions who have earned a black tie affair. The economy is like an aircraft carrier. It takes a long time to turn around but when it does it might sink this time with all the reckless moves he’s making and I doubt China will bail us out.
RiverDog wrote:
It makes you come off as looking like you're the one that's nuts. You don't use just one or two negative adjectives to describe Trump, you use 5 or 6 in a single paragraph. It's completely unnecessary and does nothing to enhance the points you are trying to make, indeed, they are counterproductive as they cause the reader to focus on you instead of your argument.
You have to understand that if 45% or so of the public voted for him that it has to include a lot of very rational, sane individuals that, for one reason or another, felt he was the best option of those being given. When you criticize Trump in such stark terms, you're insulting the intelligence of those that voted for him. It's this type of language that the far left has been using that's contributing to the split this country is experiencing and created the environment in which someone like Trump can thrive.
I firmly believe that there are a whole lot of people, mostly white males over 50 years old, that have bonded themselves to Trump in a way that causes them to internalize every attack on him as being an attack on them. Whether or not it's true is beside the point. Trump embodies the sentiment of a lot of his supporters that feel they're being made into the bad guy, that everything evil is the fault of a bunch of old, angry white males. There's been times when I've felt that way myself, but I refuse to let myself be influenced by those kinds of generalizations.
You have great points to make and I agree with your takes a lot more than I disagree. But your delivery sucks.
Hawktawk wrote: Growing up during watergate I watched a president with many accomplishments, an intelligent well spoken man re elected in a landslide be run out of office in disgrace 2 years later for doing things not nearly as egregious as what trump is doing now every day.
Hawktawk wrote:America has certainly not gotten a bit greater in the last few years, quite the contrary.Im not sure we can just flip the switch after this guy is gone, hopefully in Jan 2021 or god forbid 2025. Can you truly imagine 5.5 more years of this ?
Hawktawk wrote:We've never had a situation remotely like this. Just in the last 48 hours news breaks that Commerce Sec Wilbur ross called the acting NOAA secretary and threatened him with his job along with numerous others if he did not issue a statement defending the presidents assertions that Alabama was in the path of a hurricane. That lead to the strange unsigned declaration chastising the Birmingham office for having corrected the record after Trump's outburst on twitter.
Also multiple reports the CIA was forced to extract a covert asset from Russia who had ties to the government and knowledge of russian interference in our elections. This was done due to the presidents mishandling of classified information and strange relationship with Putin leading them to believe this person would be compromised. This goes straight to the heart of America's ability to defend itself against the only nation on the planet with a more dangerous nuclear arsenal and a flinty eyed KGB killer as a leader who clearly has Kompromat on Trump.
Also news breaking that the USAF has been diverting planes to a smaller regional airport in scotland that is in financial distress but is the only tourism hub for Trump golf resort Doonesbury. AF landings and refuels 170 in 2017, 250 in 2018, and 250+ already in 2019.US taxpayers are paying more for fuel to keep this airport viable. Pence staying at Trump's resort in Ireland 150 miles from a scheduled meeting in Dublin. The Walrus Barr booking a 30K Christmas party at Trump's DC hotel. There's never been double dealing, graft and corruption on this scale, not even close.
As for russian interference and evidence of crimes such as obstruction its far more damning than John Dean. Its from the president's own mouth on camera, his personal attorney. It's just Americans,even great patriotic ones like yourself and many others, my brother, many of my friends including my brother from another mother either just dont give a Sh!T anymore or have become so numb to what's going on they dont think it amounts to much. It boggles my mind frankly.
Hawktawk wrote:It's just Americans,even great patriotic ones like yourself and many others, my brother, many of my friends including my brother from another mother either just dont give a Sh!T anymore or have become so numb to what's going on they dont think it amounts to much. It boggles my mind frankly.
c_hawkbob wrote:Quite frankly I agree with Tawk and do not feel that this post at least is at all overstated.
Hawktawk wrote:It's just Americans,even great patriotic ones like yourself and many others, my brother, many of my friends including my brother from another mother either just dont give a Sh!T anymore or have become so numb to what's going on they dont think it amounts to much. It boggles my mind frankly.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I have no interest in impeachment when we have a stable economy, no war, and the biggest problem is Trump talking.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Trump is a narcissistic asshat that at least doesn't seem interested in war, is overseeing a very good economy, and overall hasn't had anything more unusual happen under his administration than previous ones other than running his mouth too much and creating a media frenzy with every stupid thing he says.
Aseahawkfan wrote:To sum it up, Trump is a rude, narcissistic, annoying version of Bill Clinton. If Trump had Clinton's personality, he would win re-election by a landslide if the economy stays on track. But he doesn't, he's a rude jackass that Tweets like a teenage girl and likes to get in fights with anyone that says anything even remotely against him. That may cost him re-election. Even if somehow he wins re-election, he may lose the Senate and even more of the House and end up fighting impeachment his entire second term. If the economy stays on track and we avoid war, then this will be a fairly tolerable eight years other than the rude, annoying, embarrassing, and stupid public dialogue.
I-5 wrote:The idea that because the economy is decent (not for long?) and no war (yet) is a poor excuse for the ridiculous personal attacks (John Legend? WTF!), reckless hiring and firing of his cabinet, diverting funds for his pet wall project that I challenge anyone to convince me will make one ounce of difference, profiting from having members of his administration and security (not to mention military personnel and foreign leaders) stay at his hotel properties? I could list more items, but who has that much time?
Following that logic, if we enter a recession and/or start a new military engagement, does that mean his cover is suddenly blown? I'm with HawkTalk and Bob all the way. The emperor has no clothes.
edit: his latest lie #454376 is that he announced today that he asked Bolton to resign, when Bolton said it was he who tendered his resignation first, and there is a resignation letter from Tuesday to prove it. Trump wouldn't like that, so of course he has to spin everything in a way that will make him look good. Because looking good is the only thing that matters.
RiverDog wrote:Trump basically inherited the good economy, and as we've talked about before, I have some problems with his trade war. But I do agree that he seems to have an aversion to military conflict.
You can toss in a few more adjectives, like racist and idiot. Bill Clinton, for all his faults, is not a racist and is a very intelligent man. Trump is a bigot that walks around with his head up his arse. I also agree that it wouldn't be the end of the world if he's re-elected, but it's such an abhorrent thought that I don't want to consider the consequences.
There's no comparison to a former modern day POTUS that's anywhere near like Trump. Teddy Roosevelt is perhaps the closest one that comes to mind.
Because he's a narcissistic clown that can't admit when he's wrong. Always been that way and likely a trait that has gotten worse with age. He's used to being the emperor and no one telling him he has no clothes or they're fired. The man's a control freak and he treats The White House like his company.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I forgot bigoted against immigrants, at least immigrants from nations other than Europe or Eastern Europe.
I-5 wrote:edit: his latest lie #454376 is that he announced today that he asked Bolton to resign, when Bolton said it was he who tendered his resignation first, and there is a resignation letter from Tuesday to prove it. Trump wouldn't like that, so of course he has to spin everything in a way that will make him look good. Because looking good is the only thing that matters.
Trump pulls this stuff so often that I've become numb to it. All he's doing is enhancing his own ego as it sounds better to himself and to his supporters being the tough guy by firing someone than it does accepting a resignation.
But in the long run, lies like that one don't amount to hill of beans. It's probably good that Bolton is no longer part of the Administration as he was a little too hawkish so I don't really care if he resigned or he was fired. The result is the same.
I-5 wrote:I agree with you on this one, Riv. But how does his pathological lying (which anyone but ID can plainly see as easily the nose on your face) work when it comes to moments of national security crisis? I've never seen anyone squirm around Putin the way he does, then try to spin it as the opposite the next day. I'm glad he isn't a war hawk, but that doesn't mean he won't get us in trouble with his need to satisfy his ego at any cost. I expect it will.
I-5 wrote:On that I disagree. I can't think of anything more rose-colored than the idea that his unpredictability will make us any safer. I don't think Putin is worried, do you? I think rather that Putin enjoys the weakness he sees in Trump. Do you think it was Trump's own idea to try to bring Russia into the G7?
I-5 wrote:Ironically, Reagan treated the USSR completely the opposite of Mr Kid Gloves (pun intended). Trump could not be any more weak if he tried. You are right that China presents a higher threat, but what does Putin have on this guy that makes him such milquetoast around him? We’ve never seen anyone like this.
We probably won't find out until years or even decades after Trump leaves office exactly what Putin has on Trump that makes him act as if he's wrapped around his little finger. But Trump very noticeably acts much different regarding Putin than he does any other international leader, treats him with more respect than he treats our allies. He trashes every other leader and/or country except Russia. No wonder they wanted him in the White House vs. HRC.
I-5 wrote:The Stable Genius has put the country into a tough corner, with his tough 'locked and loaded' talk, while saying he doesn't want a war with anyone. Pompeo didn't help by pointing the finger to Iran without any backing statement. I guess we'll now see what a narcissist in the White House does in a crisis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests