Just hit, 2 year extension on top of tender agreement... Will provide link when I can..

c_hawkbob wrote:For a team that's not making a lot of splashy headlines we're really having one hell of an offseason!
c_hawkbob wrote:For a team that's not making a lot of splashy headlines we're really having one hell of an offseason!
NorthHawk wrote:Good for both sides. He's a valuable go to dependable receiver who's underrated.
I hope he doesn't lose his "angry Doug" persona which got him to this point.
HumanCockroach wrote:NorthHawk wrote:Good for both sides. He's a valuable go to dependable receiver who's underrated.
I hope he doesn't lose his "angry Doug" persona which got him to this point.
As long as there is guys like Chris Carter, or fans like Future walking around calling him pedestrian I don't think that will be an issue....
briwas101 wrote:This was not a good deal by the hawks.
If baldwin wanted to play in the nfl in 2014 the Hawks were only obligated to pay him the $2m tender.
This means essentially Baldwin gets the 2m the hawks were only obligated to pay him + a 2 year extension at $5m+ per year.
I like Baldwin a lot and wanted him to stay, but he is less valuable than Tate and it is a poor decision to give Baldwin the same money they were offering Tate.
To any of you saying this is a good deal, I highly doubt a single one of you would have said he deserves a $5m/yr extension a week ago.
kalibane wrote:Tate got 6 million a year. Baldwin is getting 4.3. There is no point in acting like they could have signed Tate instead. He was more expensive than the team was willing to pay.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests