Oly wrote:I'm convinced that the 9ers need to extend Purdy to a big money contract.
As a Hawks fan, of course
River Dog wrote:In defense of Purdy, he was without a lot of his weapons. They're down to their third string running btack, without a future HOF left tackle, an all-pro wide receiver, and as I said earlier, something is different about Deebo Samuel. He's not the same player. here's no doubt that Purdy played poorly, but he's not the root cause of the Niners problems.
River Dog wrote:In defense of Purdy, he was without a lot of his weapons. They're down to their third string running btack, without a future HOF left tackle, an all-pro wide receiver, and as I said earlier, something is different about Deebo Samuel. He's not the same player. here's no doubt that Purdy played poorly, but he's not the root cause of the Niners problems.
NorthHawk wrote:Clearly that's some of the problem but he was missing wide open receivers. Deebo didn't do Purdy any favors dropping that pass in the Red Zone and it could have changed the entire outcome of the game.
But he was throwing into triple coverage along with missing receivers.
Stream Hawk wrote:I did see that. Kyle may be losing the locker room. That's a shameWhile the game didn't break the way we wanted, it did make SNF even bigger. A win and we could knock the Niners out, possibly ending their no-ring dynasty.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Frisco has always been driven by their stars. Without McCaffrey, they have lost a major weapon. I was never a huge believer in Brock Purdy either. Frisco always seemed to be so stacked with talent they could make their offense perform at a high level with almost any healthy, competent QB. But they had to have their stars working, especially the run game.
Frisco is finished this year most likely.
Now the Rams and Seahawks are head to head. Rams have the Jets, Cards, and us, so a much easier path to take the division. We may know by the time we play them who will take the division depending on the next two games against quality opponents.
River Dog wrote:
I think you can safely eliminate the "most likely" from your 2nd paragraph. Stick a fork in them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests