Hawk Sista wrote:Frickin' a. I have a sore throat and I scared the hell out of my poor dog. Specifically, I yelled at these points:
1. Fumble overturn
2. Phil Simms talking
3. Chancellor's INT
4. Wilson's INT
5. The safety
6. The prevent offense. WTF was up w/ the play calling. I'm soooo glad bevel found his courage in OT
7. Settling for a FG
8. Missing the FG
9. The entire last 59 seconds of regulation
10. All my idiot friends who thought it was a good idea to call/text during the last minute and in overtime.
WHEW! Denver looks really improved, but I think a couple a things, done differently, and we win by more. Duh.
Zorn76 wrote:There woulda been plenty of blame to go around had we dropped this one - the D for giving up the final drive in regulation, the offense for getting FG's instead of a TD, Hauschka for missing (for him) a gimme, and some strange play calling by Bevell in 2nd half.
Definitely some things to work on, but the Seahawks showed why they are clutch. Great final drive, with the best decision making QB to lead the way.
monkey wrote:Hate sounding like a whiner after a win but, that game seriously ticked me off!
It never should have gotten that close, and wouldn't have were it not for a couple of REALLY bad calls. The one that just kicks me in the gonads though is the fumble recovery that was overturned...are you FREAKING KIDDING ME?!?
How in the world was there indisputable evidence that he didn't make a "football move"? He CLEARLY made a football move, it was GLARINGLY apparent.
That was pure garbage, and I'm still irked about it.
While I'm at it, I have to ask because I looked away from the TV just as the "pick" happened, but why didn't Chancellor get that first pick he made? Was that one also overturned? If so, was it legit? I cannot say for certain, I just didn't get a great look at it, but when the play originally happened, I thought it looked like an INT, (of course I was also hoping it was, so...yeah...Biased
mykc14 wrote:
Great win against a quality opponent, good way to go into the bye. We have played 3 good teams and 2 HOF qb's and are 2-1. I like where we are sitting right now. I still feel wishy washy about Bevell and his play calling, too many weapons to have that many stalled drives, although I have a feeling that he Broncos and Chqrgers will have two of the better D's in the AFC when it is all said and done. The D really played great today, only giving up 18 points to that offense, is impressive.
If we would have had to play the blame game you certainly would have to throw RW's INT in there as well. I know tipped pass, great play by Talib, etc but those are mistakes that he just doesn't make and it shows you why Pete hates TO's so much. Once again the team that wins the TO battle won the game. Before you read this and get mad, Anthony, just calm down. It is ok to admit he made a mistake too tight of a window in that situation. On the other had he was sensational in OT and I still wouldn't take him over anybody.
HawkDawg wrote:This game was so up and down, I'm wondering how it would have played out in their house....we barely squeaked by. However, we held one of the top QB's of all time to 3 points for the majority of the game. Even if we lost, that would be something to be proud of. Not sure if it was half time adjustments or if our D just got tired during the 4th quarter.
Anyway, proud of the Hawks and I think Wilson proved himself today in a high pressure situation. I just hope the F.O. realizes that...and please, please, please don't turn him into a cute receiver. Worst/best play of the game.
monkey wrote:Hate sounding like a whiner after a win but, that game seriously ticked me off!
It never should have gotten that close, and wouldn't have were it not for a couple of REALLY bad calls. The one that just kicks me in the gonads though is the fumble recovery that was overturned...are you FREAKING KIDDING ME?!?
How in the world was there indisputable evidence that he didn't make a "football move"? He CLEARLY made a football move, it was GLARINGLY apparent.
That was pure garbage, and I'm still irked about it.
While I'm at it, I have to ask because I looked away from the TV just as the "pick" happened, but why didn't Chancellor get that first pick he made? Was that one also overturned? If so, was it legit? I cannot say for certain, I just didn't get a great look at it, but when the play originally happened, I thought it looked like an INT, (of course I was also hoping it was, so...yeah...Biased
monkey wrote:Hate sounding like a whiner after a win but, that game seriously ticked me off!
It never should have gotten that close, and wouldn't have were it not for a couple of REALLY bad calls. The one that just kicks me in the gonads though is the fumble recovery that was overturned...are you FREAKING KIDDING ME?!?
How in the world was there indisputable evidence that he didn't make a "football move"? He CLEARLY made a football move, it was GLARINGLY apparent.
That was pure garbage, and I'm still irked about it.
While I'm at it, I have to ask because I looked away from the TV just as the "pick" happened, but why didn't Chancellor get that first pick he made? Was that one also overturned? If so, was it legit? I cannot say for certain, I just didn't get a great look at it, but when the play originally happened, I thought it looked like an INT, (of course I was also hoping it was, so...yeah...Biased
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests