It was a good season while it lasted for you guys, Arizona:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12080 ... definitely
HumanCockroach wrote:He's playing games, and he was doing it last week... He named Lindley the starter, then had "several" packages for Thomas, and then there was a decent possibility that Stanton could suit for the Seahawks game.... This week is zero different, he is playing the, " prepare for multiple options" thing ( though in this case I can't fathom the benefit). Been done before, and will be done again. I didn't believe in them as a viable threat with Stanton playing, and I certainly don't now.
Hawktawk wrote: It looks like a little bit of the shine is off the COTY trophy he will likely still win.....
monkey wrote:Seriously, what's he done that's so special?
He's taken the reigns of a team with an already DOMINANT defense, one he did absolutely NOTHING to build, and just managed to do a good job with the fruits of another coaches labors.
BIG DEAL!
Seriously, I fail to see what he's done that is so special. The Cards this year were one of the single LUCKIEST teams I have ever seen ever, in terms of who they played and when, and in terms of getting lucky bounces all season long.
Yes they ended up devastated by injuries (just like the Seahawks for a while BTW!) unfortunately at the QB position, but that's sort of what you get for hanging your hat on an aging injury prone QB like Palmer...duh!
Now that the balls have stopped bouncing their way, (something which everyone should have realized would happen at some time this year, because it's inevitable that they would regress back to their mean), and they've finally actually had to play a legitimately good team, they've stopped winning like they were.
Who have they beaten this year? Name ONE team they've beaten that they can really hang their hat on... Dallas without Romo? LOL! They'd get killed by Dallas if they played them now. The Eagles? Another team that's beaten exactly no one, and is EASILY one of the NFL's two most overrated teams (the other one being the Colts, who also haven't beaten anyone or played anyone). Detroit? Please. That's BY FAR the best team they've beaten this year, and they did it while their best player was hurt...color me unimpressed!
The Cards are exactly who I've said all season they are, they are last years Chiefs the sequel. A team playing a weak schedule, and getting all kinds of lucky turnovers, which were bound to come to an end eventually.
Arians has done nothing special at all, coaching up a team full of studs that was put together by someone else.
RiverDog wrote:Playing Devil's Advocate, he's taken a team that lost it's starting quarterback in the middle of the season, its backup QB 3/4 through the season, and still led them to one of their best regular season records in team history with a chance going into the last weekend to win the division and HFA through the playoffs. This despite being projected by many to be the last place team in their division. He is a deserving candidate.
monkey wrote:Alright, then I'll ask the question back at you a different way.
Is Bruce Arians more deserving of the award than any other coach this year? That's what the mediots are all saying. The entire echo chamber is filled with the sound of Bruce Arians, coach of the year, and I am just trying to figure out what he's done that's more special than what other winning coaches have done this year. Inheriting a terrific defense, and getting incredibly lucky with the schedule and with turnovers, has zero to do with coaching,
In fact, since the ball has stopped bouncing his way so much, the decisions he's made have been mostly obvious, like try to focus on the run game, or stupid, like floundering around with which QB to start, and putting a rookie into a game in a really dumb spot etc...
He'll win, I have no doubt, the media made up their empty minds long ago on that point, but should he?
I say he's worth being in the discussion, but there's never really been a serious discussion...it's all just been the media deciding early on that he was the guy, and everyone stupidly nodding their heads in assent.![]()
Frankly, I think Carroll is more deserving by far. BY FAR!
The two coaches do have some things in common...
Arians and Carroll both have had to overcome the injury bug. Both teams had a huge amount of players put on the IR. Of course, the Seahawks have had MORE players put on the IR than the Cards...weird the media has never mentioned that LOL!
Arians and Carroll both have had their respective teams on top of the NFC West. Of course, only one has the tie breaker because, when matched up head to head, Carroll has won both times, DESTROYING the Cards easily.
Arians and Carroll both have teams with fantastic defenses, but only one of them built that defense from the ground up, literally, the other inherited the defense, and has added essentially nothing to it.
The difference, and the reason that Carroll isn't being talked about and Arians is, is because the stupid media thinks that Cinderella stories are more interesting than stories of sheer dominance. Why? I have NO IDEA!!!
If anything the fact that Pete Carroll has coached his team through an early Super Bowl hangover/slump/injury bug, while wearing the biggest target in football, and while trading away their big play offensive player (the guy they spent the entire offseason structuring their offense around) in the middle of the season, in the middle of the week, ought to make Pete Carroll the RUN AWAY favorite for COTY. Arians hasn't done anything even remotely that hard, and when they've played Seattle, they've gotten destroyed!
I cannot think of one thing that Arians has done this year that Pete Carroll hasn't ALSO done, while actually doing it BETTER except that Pete hasn't had to coach with a backup QB.
Oh and as for the "credit" Arians gets for that, he should actually be getting DOCKED for it! After all he's the guy who went and picked up an old injury prone QB and decided to try to win now with Palmer, and a really great team that someone else built!
Why is he getting credit for thinking that Carson Palmer would be "the guy" for that team?? There's not another person with a brain who thought that!
RiverDog wrote:Oh, I agree, Pete Carroll is far more deserving of COY than Arians. I was simply sticking up for the guy because I felt that he was a deserving candidate and did a commendable job under some very unique circumstances. You were making it sound like the guy wasn't good enough to wash jock straps.
The only caveat I would add about Carroll is that much of the abortion that represented the first 1/3 of the season, ie the Harvin debacle, was of his own doing. So give him credit for cleaning up the mess he created. Nevertheless, I don't see any other COY candidate out there that has done a better job than Pete, although I suppose there will be someone putting out Jason Garrett's name.
The other thing about giving it to Pete would be that it would be an acknowledgement of his rebuilding of the franchise as he has yet to receive a COY award in the 5 years he's been with us. Arians won it back in 2012, so giving two to him and none to Pete would be a travesty of monumental proportions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests